Returns

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Charle wrote:

> I would bet that 70 to 80% of most Camera returns is from lack of
> knowledge or improper use. Just like the one that returned his camera
> because it had spots on the blue sky, found out it was just dust on the
> sensor, so that one had to be repacked and what done with it, sold as new?
> I bet ebay is full of goofs or problem cameras.


It's not that uncommon at all. I made almost the
same mistake with my 10D when I first noticed the
dust spots. Odd thing was, the service guy at
BH photo was as clueless as me, and happily issued
an RMA number for me.


rafe b.
http://www.terrapinphoto.com

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

In article <47ednUsmGJCZ24bfRVn-ow@comcast.com>,
"Charle" <C@comcast.net> wrote:

> I would bet that 70 to 80% of most Camera returns is from lack of
> knowledge or improper use. Just like the one that returned his camera
> because it had spots on the blue sky, found out it was just dust on the
> sensor, so that one had to be repacked and what done with it, sold as new?
> I bet ebay is full of goofs or problem cameras.

I think one problem is camera makers are rushing cameras out without
adequate testing for bugs and errors - who can blame them? Demand for
digitals has gone up in the past two years and a camera manufactured in,
say 2001, seems hopelessly outdated now.

Recently I've had two cameras that needed repair - a Nikon Coolpix with
a 'lens error' (apparently a common problem) and a Fuji S7000 with
serious battery drain when using CF cards.

Digitals are not known for being rugged, drop them and something is
often damaged inside.

However, that said, I won't be returning to film anytime soon except for
my Stereo Realist - something a digital cannot replace.

If dust on the sensor is a problem and you're not a pro user, I'd
suggest buying a single lens for that Dslr and never remove it or buy a
cheaper fixed lens jobbie.