Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > Graphics Cards > ASUS 8800GTS 320MB is it a good dedicated PHYSX card?

ASUS 8800GTS 320MB is it a good dedicated PHYSX card?

Forum Graphics & Displays : Graphics Cards ASUS 8800GTS 320MB is it a good dedicated PHYSX card?

Word :    Username :           
 
Register or log in to remove.

shash89 wrote :

My main GPU is EVGA GTX460



Yeah, the 8800GTS can handle Physx ok over all if you decide to use one as a dedicated card. If you wish to see how much faster stuff is handled by it compared to just the 460 doing physx and grafx both, run something like the Batman AA ingame benchmark with Physx set to high and compare the results.

Reply to professorprofessorson

no that gpu is not worth it nowadays,less memory can bottleneck it at certain points,i would suggest a gt 240 ddr3 version over it.those are cheaper nowadays.

Reply to mrjericho1991

mrjericho1991 wrote :

no that gpu is not worth it nowadays,less memory can bottleneck it at certain points,i would suggest a gt 240 ddr3 version over it.those are cheaper nowadays.



He wont be using it for games, just physx. On that the ram doesn't really matter, as the 8800GTS 320 cards have proven themselves as fine stand alone physx cards (I can even speak with experience on that as I have used them for it along with 9600 GSO 1.5GB and 8600 GT cards). The 8800 GTS and the GT 240 do perform similarly on games themselves as a stand alone card as is (GTS 320 only gets hurt at really high res due to 320 megs ram). They both perform basically about the same as a physx card. He would benefit from not having to run a pci-e cable to the GT 240 though. Price wise either of those cards will run him about the same on the used market, and if he already has the 8800 GTS, no point in ditching it for a GT 240 just to avoid using a pci-e cable.

Reply to professorprofessorson

but that is very old,if he is just doing physx.best is gt 430 or gt 240.no need for old card.

Reply to mrjericho1991

mrjericho1991 wrote :

but that is very old,if he is just doing physx.best is gt 430 or gt 240.no need for old card.




It doesn't matter if the 8800 GTS 320 is older. It performs at Physx basically the same regardless of its age, which is why it became a fav for people who wanted to have a dedicated physx card. Like I said, if he already has one, no point in ditching it for something that will only do physx at the exact same performance level. It would just be a waste of money and time. Also, tech wise, the GT 240 is not really any more advanced over the 8800 GTS 320. They are both Direct X 10 cards at basically the same performance level.

Reply to professorprofessorson

but if he already does not had it,then i would go with gt 240 even gt 220 is good performer when it comes to physx

Reply to mrjericho1991

mrjericho1991 wrote :

but if he already does not had it,then i would go with gt 240 even gt 220 is good performer when it comes to physx



The GT 220 would do the job, but is a bit slower at Physx then either the GT 240 or 8800GTS, enough to not be the best buy for such a task, especially considering the Gt 220 will basically cost him the exact same and perform a bit worse. Yeah, as I said above, if he already has a 8800GTS, stick with that, if not, he could get the GT 240 and benefit from not having to use a extra pci-e cable for power. Cost wise, he will end up spending about the same on either a used GT 240 or 8800 GTS 320. The Gt 220 is def not a good idea at all considering its cost versus physx performance when compared against the other two, and should just be avoided unless you can somehow nab one in the USD 20 dollar range.

Reply to professorprofessorson

mrjericho1991 wrote :

but if he already does not had it,then i would go with gt 240 even gt 220 is good performer when it comes to physx


a gt220 would be slower and sucks for physx. an 8800 320 would be fine, large amounts of memory is not crucial when used as a dedicated physx card. If you have the 8800 card lying around, use it for physx, if your buying a card, a 512mb card would be better like an 8800gt or 9600gt pr gt240.

------------------------------ INTEL CORE 2 Q6600 @ 3.49GHz, CM Hyper TX3, ASUS P5N-D, 8GB DDR800 RAM, Powercolour HD6850, 650w Antec Trupower New PSU
Reply to iam2thecrowe

Thanks everyone, i already owned 8800GTS 320MB this is my previous GPU so i decided to get a work from it though as dedicated physx card for my EVGA GTX 460, so before that only i just asked you guys opinion with this card.

Reply to shash89

A GT220 is nothing but a waste of money even as a stand alone card much less a dedicated card for physx. GT240 is a rather pricey card when I can get a 9800gtx for the same price or less. For physx it is fine but not worth the purchase unless don't want the cables and heat ect or got a weak psu. That 8800gts is just fine for the job.

Reply to nforce4max
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphics & Displays > Graphics Cards > ASUS 8800GTS 320MB is it a good dedicated PHYSX card?
Go to:

There are 1883 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
7970 vs 670
By yougotjaked, 3 hours ago:

I do video/photo editing and 3D modeling and I haven't had any problems. You could wait...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts