For 8GB RAM is there a significant difference between 2x4GB and 4x2GB?

Status
Not open for further replies.

AntaresX

Distinguished
Apr 26, 2012
148
0
18,690
Is one better than the other? If it matters, the RAM I'm considering where I'm seeing this difference is Corsair Vengeance. But I imagine if there is or is not a difference between the two options, it will be the same across all types.
 
Solution
As others have said, the fewer devices on the bus the better for overclocking and reliability in general.

For performance, having twice as many chips means twice as much potential for open rows so there *may* be a slight performance advantage there assuming the exact same clocks and timings are used between 2x4GB and 4x2GB configurations. And by slight, I mean less than 1% so using 2x4GB to leave two slots open for future upgrade as suggested above is a much better option.

AntaresX

Distinguished
Apr 26, 2012
148
0
18,690


Thank you for the quick response. Is that because it's just two less chances for something to go wrong, or is there something more complex at work? I would like to overclock at some point, so this interests me.
 

boju

Titan
Ambassador
as above. If your mother board supports 4gb modules, chose 2x4gb as it will be less strain on the memory controller if you decide to overclock to higher frequencies.

Running at the motherboard's rated speed and frequencies will not matter if you decide to populate all dimms for maximum capacity in future. Going above and beyond in frequencies and speed will be a matter of give or take.

 

InvalidError

Titan
Moderator
As others have said, the fewer devices on the bus the better for overclocking and reliability in general.

For performance, having twice as many chips means twice as much potential for open rows so there *may* be a slight performance advantage there assuming the exact same clocks and timings are used between 2x4GB and 4x2GB configurations. And by slight, I mean less than 1% so using 2x4GB to leave two slots open for future upgrade as suggested above is a much better option.
 
Solution

AntaresX

Distinguished
Apr 26, 2012
148
0
18,690
Okay, that makes sense for overclocking. I wasn't considering future upgrades into the equation either, which is certainly an important factor for me. More important than a <1% improvement for sure.
 
It used to matter much more than it does today. Prior we used to overclock using the system buss which overclocked the memory as well. Now we just change the clock multiplier to bump up frequency. I always go for less sticks the better(at least 2 sticks if you have a dual channel memory controller).

Anyhow if your talking current PC's get 2x4GB sticks instead of 4x2GB sticks. The price is very similar, RAM is so darn cheap, and having two open slots allows for upgrades at a later date. Stability is a total non-issue, now reliability because you have more parts to fail may be an issue but 2 sticks will be just as stable as 4 sticks on current PC's.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.