Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > cameras offer wireless xfer yet?

cameras offer wireless xfer yet?

Forum Digital Camera : Digital Camera General - cameras offer wireless xfer yet?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
brainer.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Rob wrote:
> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had
> something like 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still
> (notebooks do it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be
> a no brainer.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0502/ [...] n_d2hs.asp

"High-speed wireless data transfer and camera control
The D2Hs is compatible with both the original Wireless Transmitter WT-1/1A
that expanded photographic possibilities and with the optional Wireless
Transmitter WT-2/2A, which supports IEEE 802.11g for faster transfer
speeds as well as IEEE 802.11b networks. The WT-2/2A also strengthens
wireless security options and supports a wider variety of network
protocols, including the new PTP/IP protocol that realizes wireless
Capture Control from a computer running Nikon Capture 4 (Ver. 4.2.1 or
later)."

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Rob wrote:

> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
> 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
> it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
> brainer.

I don't know of any cameras with built in untis, but there are
optional add-on wi-fi transmitters available now.

For Nikon

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond2h/page15.asp

For Canon

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/c [...] -6464-7556

These units are for DSLRs

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

Rob wrote:
> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
> 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
> it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
> brainer.
>
>
Kodak has a new model that uses wireless transfer. Don't know the
method, or the speed.
Some professional cameras do WiFi now, but they are VERY expensive.


--
Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:06 -0600, Jim Townsend <not@real.address>
wrote:

>Rob wrote:
>
>> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
>> 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
>> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
>> it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
>> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
>> brainer.
>
>I don't know of any cameras with built in untis, but there are
>optional add-on wi-fi transmitters available now.

Check out the Ricoh RDC-i700. It does.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/I700/I70A.HTM


******************************************************************

"The past is foreign country: they do things differently there."

_The Go-Between_
L.P. Hartley
1895 - 1972

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

"Rob" <rob@nospam.com> writes:

> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
> 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
> it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
> brainer.

As other people have mentioned, many of the high end DSLRs (Nikon D2H/D2X,
Canon 1Ds mark2, and evidently the new Kodak) have 802.11b/g connections (D2H
is 802.11b only if memory serves).

Another option is the Jobo Giga Vu Pro digital storage device, that you can
copy your memory cards to the internal disk, and then use a CF 802.11b/g card
to upload to your sever. I haven't used it, but it does sound interesting:
http://www.adorama.com/ICDGVP.html

--
Michael Meissner
email: mrmnews@the-meissners.org
http://www.the-meissners.org

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > cameras offer wireless xfer yet?
Go to:

There are 1300 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them