Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
brainer.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Rob wrote:
> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had
> something like 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still
> (notebooks do it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be
> a no brainer.
"High-speed wireless data transfer and camera control
The D2Hs is compatible with both the original Wireless Transmitter WT-1/1A
that expanded photographic possibilities and with the optional Wireless
Transmitter WT-2/2A, which supports IEEE 802.11g for faster transfer
speeds as well as IEEE 802.11b networks. The WT-2/2A also strengthens
wireless security options and supports a wider variety of network
protocols, including the new PTP/IP protocol that realizes wireless
Capture Control from a computer running Nikon Capture 4 (Ver. 4.2.1 or
later)."
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Rob wrote:
> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
> 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
> it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
> brainer.
I don't know of any cameras with built in untis, but there are
optional add-on wi-fi transmitters available now.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Rob wrote:
> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
> 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
> it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
> brainer.
>
>
Kodak has a new model that uses wireless transfer. Don't know the
method, or the speed.
Some professional cameras do WiFi now, but they are VERY expensive.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:00:06 -0600, Jim Townsend <not@real.address>
wrote:
>Rob wrote:
>
>> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
>> 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
>> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
>> it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
>> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
>> brainer.
>
>I don't know of any cameras with built in untis, but there are
>optional add-on wi-fi transmitters available now.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Rob" <rob@nospam.com> writes:
> just wondering if we were at the point yet where cameras had something like
> 802.11g to transfer photos wirelessly, or if
> that just chews up too much power to run off a battery still (notebooks do
> it but they tend to have much larger batteries).
> bluetooth is too slow unfortunately, otherwise i guess that would be a no
> brainer.
As other people have mentioned, many of the high end DSLRs (Nikon D2H/D2X,
Canon 1Ds mark2, and evidently the new Kodak) have 802.11b/g connections (D2H
is 802.11b only if memory serves).
Another option is the Jobo Giga Vu Pro digital storage device, that you can
copy your memory cards to the internal disk, and then use a CF 802.11b/g card
to upload to your sever. I haven't used it, but it does sound interesting:
http://www.adorama.com/ICDGVP.html
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.