jaguarskx said:
ATI cards have built-in audio processing so there is no need to use audio pass-thru cables. You just need to install the audio driver.
Not all HDTV are correctly recognized by video cards so you may need to adjust the scaling for 1920 x 1080 resolution to fit the screen correctly.
"Not all TV scale 1920 x 1080"? Which ones? Is it maybe the ones that brag about 720P? Hmm.
What's different about that from any other LCD? Nothing. The only difference is that virtually all TVs are either 720 (and 1280 pixels wide) or 1080P (and 1920 pixels wide) Bcuz HDTV standards in the United States and many other regions are universally 16:9 so that listing the width is redundant. You simply infer width according to its expected.
If you want a 1920*1080 TV, all you have to do is choose --->>> 1080P
The only exceptions are, the rare TV ALSO sold as PC. For example, I just got a 1920 x 1200, which is advertised as 1080P BUT it also clearly states the PC resolution. It's 16:10. I want the extra room for the taskbar. The bottom line is taht unless it says explicitly to the contrary, you may reliably infer that a 720P HDTV is simply a 1280*720 LCD (or plasma, or hybrid LED/LCD) with the appropriate HD tuner, and a 1080P AKA "Full HD" is a 1920 * 1080 display with the HD tuner.
There is no explicit difference between flat panels used in computers versus HDTVs since the standards were issued. The past confusion came from the transition, and because computer displays using CRTs were once way higher quality than LCDs and HDTV. If CRTs were still around, what you would find is people crossbuying TV and Computer CRTs, because the TV would then have to be comparable to PC displays. Think of it this way...HDTV standards in the end (decades after they started trying to standardize) were taken from the common standards already achieved in computer displays. Just as before, you could always buy a 16:9 display for your PC, but it used to cost many thousands of dollars.
Ten years ago, every geek I ever met would salivate at the notion of a 20" widescreen LCD. Few could even consider it. Thanks to HDTV, manufacturers more than doubled the niche by unifying TVs and computers now easily borrowing technology from each other, allowed huge leaps forward in economy of scale. Rear projection and CRTs fell by the wayside as now virtually all displays are either 1080 compliant, or cheap. Soon 720 will be gone, but maybe not that soon. I think that by the time smaller TVs are gone (32" used to be considered large, now its practically the smallest you see that isn't compared to portables) and people start looking at 40' at a "decent" TV for the bedroom and 46 or larger for primary TV, those with good vision will appreciate the next bump up should be 1440P. Already the high-end Macintosh displays are darn close if not exactly 1440 (for computer display, I don't know about file standards as my highest as 1200 pixel high).
Don't taking it personally, I just am frustrated at the blind leading the blind. It's harmless to post your guesses, right? Maybe for a little while but when you start to aggregate all of the empty pontification, we have a real problem with finding correct answers on the web unless you already know them. EVERY topic that I master is flooded with wrong answers and guesses. This makes it easy for companies to charge for service because simply looking for yourself means that most of your search queries by question are going to return useless hits, reading all the other losers who don't know either.
It used to be that for every question published, you'd get some answers with it, but you have people answering with stupid answers, and this flood also makes it hard for others to avoid publishing their question all over again. It's exponential trouble.
At least some sites allow ranking the answer. I hope that catches on.