iam2thecrowe :
im very confused why you have changed processors so much? isn't that costing you more money and time when you could have just settled for one good processor. IMO you should just hang on to your i3 2100 untill you can either afford the 2500k or wait till Ivy bridge chips hit shelves next year. I dont believe there would be a game out there that an i3 2100 would struggle with so i cant see the point in you upgrading just yet.
It's a long story, but lately I've been building systems with components I have laying around and/or can find new/used locally in good condition. I have a lot of spare stuff from the past which actually saves me money on buying newer parts. Sometimes I'll have to buy a couple things, but in the end, the computers end up being sold off to people that want them. I first started off with the E5300 and invested about $200 in a build around it, and pretty much.... I've built, sold, made profit, found something better, built, sold, made profit, etc... So far I haven't spent anymore than $250 tops, and currently have a pretty decent little setup which will eventually get sold.
I guess you can call me an enthusiast? My final build is going to be an i5-2400... And after that, it's time to start dumping money back into my car!
tajisi :
The Geforce 560 TI will perform nicely in most/all games paired with that chip on stock.
I highly advise against trying to overclock a 2400 by messing with the BCLK. What you gain isn't worth the long term risk to the system (in my opinion). Best case scenario? You gain five percent performance. Worst case scenario? You screw up every component in your system. I witnessed one system have a SATA (not due to the bugged chipset) failure that basically destroyed the file system on the hard drive and wrote garbage after appearing stable for a few minutes.
If you're dead set on trying it, no one can stop you. You can play with the speed bins all you want, but BCLK can be a recipe for trouble if mishandled.
All and all I honestly feel an i5 is worth the difference. Easy to handle, easy to overclock. 4.0 GHZ is pretty much assured on stock voltage, and 4.5 - 4.6 can be reached by many chips with only a small bump. Do you need the speed now? No. Later on when you want to keep the chip relevant instead of buying a new one? This is an overall better long term investment since it should chew through anything released in the next year or two, whereas a midrange GPU seems to get old faster than high end CPU.
Yea, I'm not going to try to mess with the BLCK just yet; as far as I know, the multiplier is capped at x38 so that should bring me to at least 3.4ghz @ 4 cores (compared to turbo boost running 3.4ghz @ 1 core).
I've always been an Nvidia fan, and will still remain an Nvidia fan, but the prices for the AMD's looks soo good!