Posted a little over a week ago about reboot / dead / bluescreen issues, new mobo fixed most of it.. RMA'd RAM now. But whilst figuring out what else was bad, I was looking at my temps in BIOS and heres what I found:
Intel i7 2600k (from cold boot - no run time)
Stock cooler (Old mobo) - BIOS temps: 45c
Desktop monitor (AsusProbe): ~35c
Hyper 212 Plus - BIOS temps: 43c
Desktop: N/A (wasn't able to get to the desktop due to reformat/ram issues)
Which is more reliable? Bio temp monitors or the probe, it is installed properly as was the stock cooler.. should I consider rma'ing the processor because these temps are abnormally high according to other peoples feedback on the 2600k.
Intel i7 2600k (from cold boot - no run time)
Stock cooler (Old mobo) - BIOS temps: 45c
Desktop monitor (AsusProbe): ~35c
Hyper 212 Plus - BIOS temps: 43c
Desktop: N/A (wasn't able to get to the desktop due to reformat/ram issues)
Which is more reliable? Bio temp monitors or the probe, it is installed properly as was the stock cooler.. should I consider rma'ing the processor because these temps are abnormally high according to other peoples feedback on the 2600k.