Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Is there any significant difference in the CCD element used in a digital
camera versus the one used in a video camera? Some video cameras use three
CCD's but the good digital cameras seem to get fantastic results with one
CCD. Am I missing something?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Don and Liz Campbell" <castles@yestertronics.com> wrote in message
news:4222479c$0$22515$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com...
> Is there any significant difference in the CCD element used in a digital
> camera versus the one used in a video camera? Some video cameras use three
> CCD's but the good digital cameras seem to get fantastic results with one
> CCD. Am I missing something?
>
> Thanks, Don and Liz
The sensors in digital camera's are much larger. Larger=higher quality
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Don and Liz Campbell" <castles@yestertronics.com> writes:
> Is there any significant difference in the CCD element used in a digital
> camera versus the one used in a video camera? Some video cameras use three
> CCD's but the good digital cameras seem to get fantastic results with one
> CCD. Am I missing something?
Still cameras need immensely higher resolution. This leads to greater
and greater problems keeping multiple CCDs and beamsplitters in
alignment, so that multi-chip cameras are essentially unfeasible for
still use.
The single-chip still cameras use a horrible hack called the "Bayer
filter" -- there's a color filter matrix over the sensor, so each
pixel is sensing only one color (usually one of the RGB triad; and G
twice as much as the other two for various reasons). It turns out,
however, that human vision actually has very similar properties --
higher resolution in B&W only, color at lower resolution -- so the
results work out very nicely for human vision. That is, it's not a
horrible hack at all, it's a sensible application of knowledge of the
human visual system.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, <mailtod-b@dd-b.net>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/>
RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/>
Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/>
Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.