Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I have just upgraded my digital camera to a Canon EOS 300D and expect better
quality. Professionally printed photos are excellent and I know this is the
best way to proceed.
My Epson colour 875DC printer is letting me down as all my prints done at
home are grainy with very bold colour rendition. I am using cheaper brands
of glossy paper and realise that quality differs greatly between makes.
What brand of paper is best used with this printer. Is it best to buy the
Epson paper or is there an alternatives in the UK that are better. I
usually buy A4 sheets and cut them down but I am happy to try anything.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
My experience based on the 1270, which uses similar inks, is that for glossy
I have to use Epson Glossy or Premium Glossy photo paper. For matte paper,
I don't think it'll really make much difference, but I use Epson's anyway.
"Graham Brooker" <graham.brooker@NOSPAM.cwcom.net> wrote in message
news040a2$3kj$1@titan.btinternet.com...
>I have just upgraded my digital camera to a Canon EOS 300D and expect
>better quality. Professionally printed photos are excellent and I know
>this is the best way to proceed.
>
> My Epson colour 875DC printer is letting me down as all my prints done at
> home are grainy with very bold colour rendition. I am using cheaper
> brands of glossy paper and realise that quality differs greatly between
> makes.
>
> What brand of paper is best used with this printer. Is it best to buy the
> Epson paper or is there an alternatives in the UK that are better. I
> usually buy A4 sheets and cut them down but I am happy to try anything.
>
> Any ideas appreciated.
>
> Graham Brooker
>
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:16:50 +0000 (UTC), in rec.photo.digital "Graham
Brooker" <graham.brooker@NOSPAM.cwcom.net> wrote:
>I have just upgraded my digital camera to a Canon EOS 300D and expect better
>quality. Professionally printed photos are excellent and I know this is the
>best way to proceed.
>
>My Epson colour 875DC printer is letting me down as all my prints done at
>home are grainy with very bold colour rendition. I am using cheaper brands
>of glossy paper and realise that quality differs greatly between makes.
>
>What brand of paper is best used with this printer. Is it best to buy the
>Epson paper or is there an alternatives in the UK that are better. I
>usually buy A4 sheets and cut them down but I am happy to try anything.
What app are you printing from and what size prints are you making?
Something is wrong if these are grainy in anything below 8x10.
----------
Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Phot [...] index.html
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Ed Ruf" <egruf_usenet@cox.net> wrote in message
news:2mmc21tmpuk1jgq4lvmj857likqcbof8s3@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:16:50 +0000 (UTC), in rec.photo.digital "Graham
> Brooker" <graham.brooker@NOSPAM.cwcom.net> wrote:
>
>>I have just upgraded my digital camera to a Canon EOS 300D and expect
>>better
>>quality. Professionally printed photos are excellent and I know this is
>>the
>>best way to proceed.
>>
>>My Epson colour 875DC printer is letting me down as all my prints done at
>>home are grainy with very bold colour rendition. I am using cheaper
>>brands
>>of glossy paper and realise that quality differs greatly between makes.
>>
>>What brand of paper is best used with this printer. Is it best to buy the
>>Epson paper or is there an alternatives in the UK that are better. I
>>usually buy A4 sheets and cut them down but I am happy to try anything.
>
> What app are you printing from and what size prints are you making?
> Something is wrong if these are grainy in anything below 8x10.
> ----------
> Ed Ruf
I have the 1270, which is the same printer in a wide format. My results are
stunning with Epson Premium Glossy.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:40:44 GMT, in rec.photo.digital "Tom Scales"
<tomtoo@softhome.net> wrote:
>I have the 1270, which is the same printer in a wide format. My results are
>stunning with Epson Premium Glossy.
>
>Cheap paper == bad results
So do I, along with a an R800 now and your statement is not always true.
The Epson Glossy Photo Paper sold in a 100 pack at Costco yields quite good
results. Yes, for better quality the premium paper is a bit better. Theses
printers ink does not appear to like the Kodak papers at all though.
----------
Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Phot [...] index.html
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Greetings Ed,
Try visiting the Kodak OneTouch site to get the printer settings for Kodak
paper and your printer. Make sure you have the latest driver installed and
reset the printer with the information included. This should make a
difference.
For example, if you are using Ultima paper and your Epson 1270 have the
following settings
"Ed Ruf" <egruf_usenet@cox.net> wrote in message
news:2g6o21hkjrr3tg0bdh0kk5asirocu059qc@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:40:44 GMT, in rec.photo.digital "Tom Scales"
> <tomtoo@softhome.net> wrote:
>
> >I have the 1270, which is the same printer in a wide format. My results
are
> >stunning with Epson Premium Glossy.
> >
> >Cheap paper == bad results
>
> So do I, along with a an R800 now and your statement is not always true.
> The Epson Glossy Photo Paper sold in a 100 pack at Costco yields quite
good
> results. Yes, for better quality the premium paper is a bit better. Theses
> printers ink does not appear to like the Kodak papers at all though.
> ----------
> Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
> See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at
> http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Phot [...] index.html
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.