hey guys, i'm buyin a new system and have been at research for like forever.
i simply cannot understand:
1. if i should get the phenom2 955, or intel 2500k. the intel rig would cost a lot more, and i simply cannot find any appropriate benches for gaming. all the benches i have found either don't state if they use a gpu (and then obviously there's a big difference between the results), or are not on the correct res, FHD. (which also is supposed to have a smaller difference between the results).
i have only found two benches: 1. where the 2500k leads by only 13 frames (which supports the decision not to add all that money). 2. where the 2500k leads by a longshot (@ starcraft2). however, i have read that something about the programming in the graphics for this game favors intel, and obviously it does not take advantage of the quad on both processors, which should also reduce the difference between the two.
2. regarding memory, if 4gb 1333mhz CL9 is enough, or if 8gb/lower latency/faster mhz is necessary (i have only seen some charts on this site where there is barely a 1% improvement for gaming).
3. gpu: to go with a 570gtx now (which is highly overkill atm), or get a 6850 and in a year from now either upgrade and sell, or add another card (by then the price will drop for the 2nd card, and i wouldnt be having any overkill that i'm paying for when i don't need it). (even if i were to get two 6850s atm i have seen charts where they kill the 570 (and it's roughly the same price)).
thank you
i simply cannot understand:
1. if i should get the phenom2 955, or intel 2500k. the intel rig would cost a lot more, and i simply cannot find any appropriate benches for gaming. all the benches i have found either don't state if they use a gpu (and then obviously there's a big difference between the results), or are not on the correct res, FHD. (which also is supposed to have a smaller difference between the results).
i have only found two benches: 1. where the 2500k leads by only 13 frames (which supports the decision not to add all that money). 2. where the 2500k leads by a longshot (@ starcraft2). however, i have read that something about the programming in the graphics for this game favors intel, and obviously it does not take advantage of the quad on both processors, which should also reduce the difference between the two.
2. regarding memory, if 4gb 1333mhz CL9 is enough, or if 8gb/lower latency/faster mhz is necessary (i have only seen some charts on this site where there is barely a 1% improvement for gaming).
3. gpu: to go with a 570gtx now (which is highly overkill atm), or get a 6850 and in a year from now either upgrade and sell, or add another card (by then the price will drop for the 2nd card, and i wouldnt be having any overkill that i'm paying for when i don't need it). (even if i were to get two 6850s atm i have seen charts where they kill the 570 (and it's roughly the same price)).
thank you