Hello everyone.
I will be getting a vostro 1500 laptop with a geforce 8600 gt video card. the processor will be upgraded to support CPU-intensive video games (supreme commander). there are 2 processors that i could get, a t9300 (2.5 ghz, 6mb l2 cache, 800 MHz bus speed) and the x7800 (2.6 ghz, 4mb l2 cache, 800 MHz bus speed). is the larger cache size worth the slower core speed? both of these are about $80. or, would it be better to spend another $60 and get the x7900(2.8 ghz core speed, 4mb l2 cache, 800 MHz bus speed.) or to spend $200 on the x9000 (2.8 ghz core speed, 6 MB l2 cache, 800 MHz bus speed)
t9300 $72
x7800 $80
x7900 $160
x9000 $200
which one would be the best?
the laptop's gpu is a 128 bit, 575 MHz, 700mhz memory, 256 MB video ram, seen it get 46 fps on crysis.
I will be getting a vostro 1500 laptop with a geforce 8600 gt video card. the processor will be upgraded to support CPU-intensive video games (supreme commander). there are 2 processors that i could get, a t9300 (2.5 ghz, 6mb l2 cache, 800 MHz bus speed) and the x7800 (2.6 ghz, 4mb l2 cache, 800 MHz bus speed). is the larger cache size worth the slower core speed? both of these are about $80. or, would it be better to spend another $60 and get the x7900(2.8 ghz core speed, 4mb l2 cache, 800 MHz bus speed.) or to spend $200 on the x9000 (2.8 ghz core speed, 6 MB l2 cache, 800 MHz bus speed)
t9300 $72
x7800 $80
x7900 $160
x9000 $200
which one would be the best?
the laptop's gpu is a 128 bit, 575 MHz, 700mhz memory, 256 MB video ram, seen it get 46 fps on crysis.