Between Intel & Amd's stock heat sink installation, I personally like AMD's better. With AMD, you pretty much hook one end of the cooler to the board & then hook the other & then latch it into place. Also when the cooler isn't latched, both sides of cooler will be pretty loose, until it's latched/locked into position
With Intel, you have to press the cooler down into 4 holes, making sure each one "snaps" into place. Most of the time, I can get 3 of them to snap into place, but the 4th is a pain.
Overall I would say that both method used are not easy to crush the cpu, but they do make after market cooling kits that work really well & don't feel like you are "crushing" the cpu.
For instance, I just upgraded to the I7 2600k yesterday & installed my H60 cooler. It has a back plate for the motherboard, which allows me to screw on the cooler. The AMD method hooks on (like the stock cooler), but you tighen the hook to lock into place.
On a side note, depending on price & what you already have, to also look at Intel, before making the purchase. Unless of course, you already have an AM3 motherboard
th3harbinger :
Hey, I am soon building my first computer and was wondering about the difficulty of AMD compared to Intel.
I have heard the AMD heat sinks are very difficult to install and it is easy to crush the CPU is this true?
I would like to be able to upgrade to the bulldozers early next year, so i'm kind of hoping that AMD isn't too difficult.