Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > [Maxxum 7D] Dimage RAW Viewer v. Adobe Raw Plugin

[Maxxum 7D] Dimage RAW Viewer v. Adobe Raw Plugin

Forum Digital Camera : Digital Camera General - [Maxxum 7D] Dimage RAW Viewer v. Adobe Raw Plugin

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

According to Phil Askey (dpreview), the quality of images obtained via
the Dimage Viewer RAW converter is not as good as that provided by the
Adobe Raw plugin.

Has anyone else made comparisons between the two?

Cheers,
Alan.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

>According to Phil Askey (dpreview), the quality of images obtained via

>the Dimage Viewer RAW converter is not as good as that provided by the

>Adobe Raw plugin.
>
>Has anyone else made comparisons between the two?

Haven't used the Dimage converter (for obvious reasons) but Adobe CS
RAW does give better results than the Canon software. However I get
even better results with the Phase One Capture One software (free demos
for up to 60 days without restrictions) and the new Rawshooter
Essentials (free, for now). Dunno if they support the Minolta digitals
but if they do they are worth a look.

Bill

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

On 8 Mar 2005 17:59:33 -0800, "Bill Hilton" <bhilton665@aol.com>
wrote:

>>According to Phil Askey (dpreview), the quality of images obtained via
>
>>the Dimage Viewer RAW converter is not as good as that provided by the
>
>>Adobe Raw plugin.
>>
>>Has anyone else made comparisons between the two?
>
>Haven't used the Dimage converter (for obvious reasons) but Adobe CS
>RAW does give better results than the Canon software. However I get
>even better results with the Phase One Capture One software (free demos
>for up to 60 days without restrictions) and the new Rawshooter
>Essentials (free, for now). Dunno if they support the Minolta digitals
>but if they do they are worth a look.
>
>Bill

Raw Shooter Essentials does support my Minolta A2.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Bill Hilton wrote:
> >According to Phil Askey (dpreview), the quality of images obtained
via
>
> >the Dimage Viewer RAW converter is not as good as that provided by
the
>
> >Adobe Raw plugin.
> >
> >Has anyone else made comparisons between the two?
>
> Haven't used the Dimage converter (for obvious reasons) but Adobe CS
> RAW does give better results than the Canon software. However I get
> even better results with the Phase One Capture One software (free
demos
> for up to 60 days without restrictions) and the new Rawshooter
> Essentials (free, for now). Dunno if they support the Minolta
digitals
> but if they do they are worth a look.

I tested the phase one capture one today and am very impressed. The
sharpening feature is miles ahead of CS. I'm definately going to
purchase it!


>
> Bill

PB

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > [Maxxum 7D] Dimage RAW Viewer v. Adobe Raw Plugin
Go to:

There are 488 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them