Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Upgrade Dual Core CPU to quad of upgrade RAM

Upgrade Dual Core CPU to quad of upgrade RAM

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs Upgrade Dual Core CPU to quad of upgrade RAM

Word :    Username :           
 
- 0 +

Current Set Up:

Windows 7 64bit
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5300 "LGA775 Core 2" 2.6Ghz (800fsb)
Seagate Barracuda 7200 12 500GB SATA-II 16mb cahe - OEM
Nvidia GTX470 1024mb
Gigabyte GA-G41M-E2SL Intel G41 (socket 775) PC-I Express DDR2 Motherboard
Corsair 600w psu
Corsair XMS2 4 GB (2 times 2gb) DDR2, TwinX Dual Channel




Hi, I'm having a little trouble playing the latest games on my system. I have just upgraded to a gtx470 I found on the cheap, but in high performance games (i've been trying to play battlefield 3 beta) the fps are 20 or below (sometimes 15).

Should I upgrade my CPU (the best I think I can get for my motherboard (Socket 775) and limited funds is an intel duo quadcore 2.66ghz). Or should I upgrade to 8gb RAM?

When playing games my Free Physical Memory hovers on zero and CPU usage is 100% (according to performance manager)

Any help would be really appreciated.

Thanks :)

Reply to ben034
Register or log in to remove.

your RAM is fine, CPU will struggle in CPU demanding games. if you can get a quad CPU cheap (socket 775 is old) it would be a good step up.

http://static.techspot.com/articles-info/448/bench/CPU_02.png

Reply to dirtyferret
- 0 +

Thanks dirtyferret, much appreciated!

Reply to ben034

As you can see in my signature I have much of the same hardware as you but with a quadcore. My machine handles BF3 without a glitch ;)

------------------------------ i5-2500K|16Gb HyperX|GTX470 @ GTX 480 speeds|Patriot SSD system drive|1Tb WD Black|LG Blu-ray|550W Chill Innovation PSU|Gigabyte Z68AP-D3|Logitech G5|Logitech K360 keyboard|Antec 300 case|PHILIPS 273ELH 27" monitor
Reply to ChrisCornell

are you looking at a q6600 or a q9400 ?

Reply to spentshells
- 0 +

I was looking at the q9400

http://www.pc-titan.com/product_in [...] 9400-.html

I've also seen a Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 LGA775 'Yorkfield' 2.5GHz 4MB-cache for slightly cheaper than the above.

I would appreciate your opinion. Thanks

Reply to ben034
- 0 +

ben034 wrote :

I was looking at the q9400

http://www.pc-titan.com/product_in [...] 9400-.html

I've also seen a Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 LGA775 'Yorkfield' 2.5GHz 4MB-cache for slightly cheaper than the above.

I would appreciate your opinion. Thanks





Go with the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 or higher and if possible overclock the CPU to 3 to 3.4Ghz and that would be fine for a nice gaming experience. Also since you have a GTX470 ensure that you have a good PSU to power the system......... :wahoo:

Reply to spp85

quad will make a huge difference, i've the same gpu but a better CPU and BF3 was quick enough

Reply to 13thmonkey
- 0 +

Cheers, I have a brand new 600w corsair CX600 psu. That should be fine right?

Reply to ben034

ben034 wrote :

Cheers, I have a brand new 600w corsair CX600 psu. That should be fine right?



plenty of power

Reply to dirtyferret
- 0 +

Actually scrap PC Titan website - looks like a scam.

Reply to ben034
- 0 +

Also does anyone know where I could find a Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 reasonably priced. There doesn't seem to be many out there. I can find plenty of Q8400's for £120ish. Is there that much difference between the two?

Reply to ben034

I dont think a quad will help him much. I have a Q6600 and it runs as same as duals with a bit higher speeds.
Look at the I5- second generation, they actually are better in games since games dont use more than 2 cores anyway.

i would not suggest upgrading the cpu to a quad but getting a new platform or overclocking your CPU.

Reply to cats_paw

Actually BF3 and some other games are a lot happier with a slower quad than a fast dual, and do use the extra cores extensively.

I'm surprised you are seeing 15-20 FPS in BF3, the duals in the above benchmark run 40+ average and they are not much faster; you may be GPU limited if higher than 1080p.

If you cannot find a reasonable priced core 2 quad consider a core 2 duo like the E8400, or a LGA1155 setup since DDR3 is so cheap right now.

Reply to BlacKHawK3

newegg has recertified q9400's
my q6600 is faster at 3ghz than my e5300 at 4ghz

Reply to spentshells
- 0 +

spentshells wrote :

newegg has recertified q9400's
my q6600 is faster at 3ghz than my e5300 at 4ghz




Newegg is a US company? I've seen a q8400 for £120 inc delivery, so might go with that, fingers crossed. Thanks for the help!

Reply to ben034

Better quad = more money, so go for whatever is available in your budget.

However, you have a quality system (good PSU, GPU, RAM) aside from the CPU and I would certainly go for the quad... it will keep you gaming for a while yet.

Reply to BlacKHawK3
- 0 +

As for dual core vs. quad core, that depends on your programs. Some people have addressed that issue above.

You can overclock your current processor. Check old tom's articles where they have gotten that processor to near 4 GHz. You would need a new CPU cooler for that, and maybe a new motherboard. Or you could just try it with your current motherboard to see how high it will go.

The Q6600 and Q9400 are good processors but require a lot of other stuff for a successful overclock. The Q6600 has a multiplier of 9, the Q9400 has a multiplier of 8. My experience is that the Q9400 will overclock a little higher. I took a Q6600 to 3.5GHz and that was as high as I could go. With a multiplier of 9 this requires system bus speed of 389 and 800MHz ram. Your motherboard might or might not do this. A Q9400 can go higher, mine went to 3.8GHz, but with the multiplier of 8 this requires a real good motherboard that can run at 475MHz and ram that will run at 950MHz.

Reply to cadder

yeah cadder that is tops for my q6600 8x475 ram 1:1

Reply to spentshells

I'm not sure where his chip is compared to those in the chart, but my guess is the Athlon II down at the bottom. That chip scores 40FPS, but it clocked nearly a gig higher. OCing his CPU might help, but if he can score a quad cheap enough it should keep him gaming for a lot longer. OCing his CPU is also probably not possible in his case as he has a G41 chipset. Not known for their OCing abilities. I'm on the other side of the pond and don't know your websites.

------------------------------ The voice of REASON
Do NOT feed the TROLLS!
Always a DEMON!
Reply to 4745454b

4745454b wrote :

I'm not sure where his chip is compared to those in the chart, but my guess is the Athlon II down at the bottom. That chip scores 40FPS, but it clocked nearly a gig higher. OCing his CPU might help, but if he can score a quad cheap enough it should keep him gaming for a lot longer. OCing his CPU is also probably not possible in his case as he has a G41 chipset. Not known for their OCing abilities. I'm on the other side of the pond and don't know your websites.



Agreed...

By the way the E5300 is only about 10-15% slower than that Athlon x2 250, despite the clocks...

Reply to BlacKHawK3
- 0 +

Sorry guys, one more question...

I've been tinkering with my Bus Speed. In CPU-Z the multiplier fluctuates between 6 and 13 (the core speed appears to jump between approx 1412mhz and double that value)

Why is this please? Is it to do with some sort of energy saving setting? How can I accurately assess my increased CPU speed after overclocking?

Thanks

Reply to ben034

Correct, in Intel's case its called Speedstep.

 

When your computer is idle or doing a light load, it will leave the multiplier at 6x. This saves you money, power, and emits less heat into your case. When you are doing a demanding CPU task like a benchmark or game, it will go back to its default (or setting you entered in the bios) automatically. Normally you want to leave it alone as its nothing to usually worry about.

 

Edited for spelling.


Message edited by 4745454b on 10-11-2011 at 03:15:26 AM
------------------------------ The voice of REASON
Do NOT feed the TROLLS!
Always a DEMON!
Reply to 4745454b
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Upgrade Dual Core CPU to quad of upgrade RAM
Go to:

There are 1819 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Heat-sink recommendation for i5-2500k LGA 1155 CPU
By lilotimz, 6 hours ago:

The best performing and efficient CPU cooler under $50 would by the CM Hyper 212+ or CM...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts