Official Bulldozer benchmarks released

Status
Not open for further replies.

ghnader hsmithot

Distinguished

I think its true.
 

BlacKHawK3

Distinguished
Oct 4, 2011
225
0
18,760
lab501 likely didn't have any of these; especially since those results look like an 8-core Thuban, and AMD isn' t likely to have spent 3 years to get that for final performance...
 

BlacKHawK3

Distinguished
Oct 4, 2011
225
0
18,760
if you are on .uk its 14 on .com its 18... not sure why but visit the bulldozer rumors thread for a lighthearted discussion of the possibilities...

What number do you see:
 

badtaylorx

Distinguished
Apr 7, 2011
827
0
19,060
dominharbor(intel fanboys) have since come out with benchs that seem to suggest that those 501 benches are not accurate (has alot to do with a windows scheduler patch??? er som'n the like)
 

BlacKHawK3

Distinguished
Oct 4, 2011
225
0
18,760


1) Wait till tomorrow when the NDA lifts and we have real benches.

2) Who seriously expected bulldozer to crush sandy bridge? Really? All the actual evidence at this juncture points to it being on par with Nehelem in single threaded apps and slightly faster than SB in multithreaded ones.

3) Did you even see what I posted 6 inches above this??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.