Greetings. I'm facing the following decision on lifespan and value, and hope that perhaps some of you have some insightful comments to help me make the right choice.
My desktop computer is currently powered by a Core 2 Duo E8500 on a P-45 based motherboard with 4 GB DDR2 and a Radeon HD 4650. I'm about to build my first HTPC. This leaves me with two choices:
■ 1. I can recycle my desktop's CPU, GPU, HDD and PSU for HTPC duty. I would still need a case, motherboard (mATX instead of ATX) and RAM for the HTPC. I would need to rebuild my desktop computer, in which case I'd get something like a Core i5-2500K, a ~$100 GPU, about 8 GB of RAM, an SSD and of course a motherboard and PSU -- a pretty nice upgrade I guess.
■ 2. I can get all new stuff for the HTPC. I'm thinking a Core i3-2100T. Otherwise roughtly the same components as in 1 (different motherboard chipset, of course, but price-wise comparable). (Sidenote: No discrete GPU in this case... am I correct in thinking I won't be affected by the Sandy Bridge 23.976 f/s problem if I don't have a fancy TV capable of that framerate anyway?).
Option 1 costs pretty much precisely twice as much as option 2.
So here's my dilemma: I'm only a casual gamer (some Bad Company 2, some Civilization V), and so gaming performance is only a little bit relevant. Considering that, my current desktop rig is doing just fine, and it feels like an overkill to upgrade. But then again, it probably will see an upgrade in about two years' time, and then the Core 2 Duo E8500 and GPU will end up doing absolutely nothing. That stuff is perfectly capable of satisfying my HTPC needs for years and years to come. Feels like a waste.
Any thoughts?
My own summary is pretty much:
■ 1. Advantages: Old equipment stays in HTPC service indefinitely. Desktop PC gets a significant overhaul (well, it's completely replaced, essently a new PC). 23.967 f/s problem definitely avoided due to discrete graphics card in HTPC. Disadvantages: It's twice the cost of option 2, and while cool, not something I really need.
■ 2. Advantages: It's half the price of option 1. The Core i3-2100T has awesome TDP. Disadvantages: The stuff that I have is more than sufficient for HTPC duty for the foreseeable future (I'm not at all interested in 3D video, and the HTPC will only play video and music... in that sense it could live for a decade )
All in all: An HTPC for $x, or a just as good (except heat-wise) HTPC and a brand new desktop computer for $2x? I don't really need the brand new desktop, but it feels like a compelling "offer".
My desktop computer is currently powered by a Core 2 Duo E8500 on a P-45 based motherboard with 4 GB DDR2 and a Radeon HD 4650. I'm about to build my first HTPC. This leaves me with two choices:
■ 1. I can recycle my desktop's CPU, GPU, HDD and PSU for HTPC duty. I would still need a case, motherboard (mATX instead of ATX) and RAM for the HTPC. I would need to rebuild my desktop computer, in which case I'd get something like a Core i5-2500K, a ~$100 GPU, about 8 GB of RAM, an SSD and of course a motherboard and PSU -- a pretty nice upgrade I guess.
■ 2. I can get all new stuff for the HTPC. I'm thinking a Core i3-2100T. Otherwise roughtly the same components as in 1 (different motherboard chipset, of course, but price-wise comparable). (Sidenote: No discrete GPU in this case... am I correct in thinking I won't be affected by the Sandy Bridge 23.976 f/s problem if I don't have a fancy TV capable of that framerate anyway?).
Option 1 costs pretty much precisely twice as much as option 2.
So here's my dilemma: I'm only a casual gamer (some Bad Company 2, some Civilization V), and so gaming performance is only a little bit relevant. Considering that, my current desktop rig is doing just fine, and it feels like an overkill to upgrade. But then again, it probably will see an upgrade in about two years' time, and then the Core 2 Duo E8500 and GPU will end up doing absolutely nothing. That stuff is perfectly capable of satisfying my HTPC needs for years and years to come. Feels like a waste.
Any thoughts?
My own summary is pretty much:
■ 1. Advantages: Old equipment stays in HTPC service indefinitely. Desktop PC gets a significant overhaul (well, it's completely replaced, essently a new PC). 23.967 f/s problem definitely avoided due to discrete graphics card in HTPC. Disadvantages: It's twice the cost of option 2, and while cool, not something I really need.
■ 2. Advantages: It's half the price of option 1. The Core i3-2100T has awesome TDP. Disadvantages: The stuff that I have is more than sufficient for HTPC duty for the foreseeable future (I'm not at all interested in 3D video, and the HTPC will only play video and music... in that sense it could live for a decade )
All in all: An HTPC for $x, or a just as good (except heat-wise) HTPC and a brand new desktop computer for $2x? I don't really need the brand new desktop, but it feels like a compelling "offer".