Hi guys, im about buy a new Card, and had my heart set on the Hawk coz if its OC capabilities, and it looks Great,
Bu the KFA 550 ti is cheaper and has the Memory Advantage!!!???
I would get the 460 unless the 550 is ALOT cheaper. Even the 768m version of the 460 is signifigantly faster than the 550 ti. More memory isn't an advantage if the card isn't fast enough to use it.
It's about 20% faster from the benchmarks I've seen. You can't just go by clock speeds, they are totally different chips. Newer games might use more than 1gb of dedicated video ram in some instances, but it won't be required and having 2gb of ram wont make up for the 550 being 20% slower. It's the proverbial lipstick on a pig.
Heres the specs i was comparing......:
KFA 550 Ti
Core Clock: 950MHz (Overclocked from 900MHz)
Shader Clock: 1900MHz (Overclocked from 1800MHz)
Memory Clock: 3900MHz GDDR5
Stream Processors: 192
GTX 460 Hawk
Core Clock: 780/810 Mhz ( i hear it can be clocked to 1Ghz)
Shader Clock: 1560/1620 MHz
Memory Clock: 3600/3900 MHz GDDR5
Stream Processors: ???
Sorry if im persistent, i just wan to be thurough and know what im spending my money on, ive been behind the Hawk al the way just wanted to be sure.