Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

AMD CPU six core war

Last response: in CPUs
Share
October 15, 2011 2:03:07 PM

So we all see what the benchmarks say about the Bulldozer but.... Who do you think is better AMD FX-6100 Zambezi 3.3GHz or Phenom II X6 1100T

More about : amd cpu core war

a c 863 à CPUs
a c 335 À AMD
October 15, 2011 2:37:44 PM

Currently the X6 1100T! It was competing well and winning some against the FX8150 in the release reviews!
m
0
l
a c 83 à CPUs
a b À AMD
October 15, 2011 4:11:18 PM

Phenom II X6, the individual cores are more powerful. 3dguru.com reviewed the 8150, 6100, and 4100.
m
0
l
Related resources
a b à CPUs
October 15, 2011 10:43:53 PM

Unless you need the new AVX instructions that Zambezi offers, the PhenomII performs faster and uses less power.
m
0
l
October 23, 2011 12:02:29 AM

Were did you hear that
m
0
l
a c 86 à CPUs
a b À AMD
October 23, 2011 8:06:55 AM

CowboyTech91 said:
Were did you hear that

just google "amd bulldozer review" its all over the web that they do not perform as predicted, and have worse per-core performance than the phenom II.
m
0
l
October 23, 2011 8:26:05 AM

depends , i think at 4.8-5 ghz the 6100 would tie the 1100t at 4.0-4.2 ghz, and in windows 8 should definitly beat it in most new games. the 6100 is more future proof.
m
0
l
October 23, 2011 12:05:09 PM

If you can afford and know how to install watercooling and have a 1000 watt psu handy then get the Bulldozer. ¬_¬
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
October 23, 2011 12:10:27 PM

Well relatively speaking, AMD Bulldozer doesn't consume as much power as a real bulldozer.

Good for marketing.
m
0
l
October 23, 2011 12:19:39 PM

If you're cooling it with air that it'd be just as loud.

I love AMD but bulldozer was just...too much for me T_T
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
October 23, 2011 12:20:48 PM

You can also multitask very easily and safely on the AMD Bulldozer - not really a good idea on a real bulldozer though.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
October 23, 2011 12:21:44 PM

I'm just disappointed that my motherboard refuses to support Am3+ CPUs when it was marketed as supporting the such.
m
0
l
a b à CPUs
October 23, 2011 12:28:32 PM

What board is that?
m
0
l
October 23, 2011 12:30:38 PM

Some work with a BIOS update but they underperform by 5-10%
m
0
l
a c 86 à CPUs
a b À AMD
October 24, 2011 11:18:49 AM

polyzp said:
depends , i think at 4.8-5 ghz the 6100 would tie the 1100t at 4.0-4.2 ghz, and in windows 8 should definitly beat it in most new games. the 6100 is more future proof.

it is not more future proof, its slower.
m
0
l
!