....and it appears that 'We Are Not Amused...'
Source article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124337851597556133.html
Source article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124337851597556133.html
The latest demonstration comes from Europe's bustling trustbuster, Neelie Kroes. Her $1.45 billion fine levied on Intel is vaporware in the first place, since collection would occur years from now only if a court agrees. Not a whit of due process has yet taken place: Ms. Kroes's agency acts as prosecutor, judge and jury. One day the media will figure out that findings delivered under such circumstances are not a judicial outcome, and not deserving of the news fanfare they now receive.
Intel's competitor, Advanced Micro Devices, along with their customers, are cast as victims of Intel's practice of using volume discounts, rebates and loyalty programs to induce (allegedly) the Dells and Hewlett Packards of the world to restrict their purchases of AMD chips.
Already this is a falsification of the chip business. Intel's volume rewards do not control buyer behavior, but do reflect the reality that Intel is the industry's dominant supplier of capital and productive capacity, requiring sufficient volume to justify the increasingly astronomical cost of designing and mass-producing the next-generation of chips in line with Moore's law.
One and all benefit, including AMD, because this "upgrade cycle" then gins up sales of PCs and software.
But Intel's customers also depend on the continued existence of AMD to discipline Intel's pricing. This fact goes a long way toward explaining AMD's ability to survive and raise capital despite legendary production snafus and gigantic losses. Chip buyers have a strategic interest in buying AMD chips regardless of any Intel volume discounts. Dell, HP, IBM, Sun, Cray and others lined up two years ago to buy AMD's ill-fated "Barcelona" chip. Intel customers all, they were set to roll out 50 new systems based on the AMD chip -- which AMD failed to deliver.