Turion 64 vs. Pentium M on Compaq v2000z and v2000

Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops,alt.comp.hardware (More info?)

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:03:40 -0700, zip_56 wrote:

> I'm planning on buying a Laptop and I'm facing a very difficult
> choice: Should I go with AMD's Turion 64 or Pentium M ?
>
> I really like the idea of having a 64bit system so I will be able to
> upgrade in the future (my laptop has to last at least 3 to 4 years), on
> the other hand I hear that the Turion64 drains much more juice from the
> battery than the Pentium M. I'm trying to find out if it is possible
> to find a balance between in having the 64bit upgradeability of the
> Turion64 and a good battery run time.
>
> I am looking at the Compaq v2000z (Turion64) and the Compaq v2000
> (Pentium M). Does anybody have any battery run time data/comparison
> from these machines? Would I be losing a lot of battery time if I get
> the v2000z (Turion64)? I would like to have some user impressions from
> these machines, specially the Turion64 as it is harder to find info
> about it on the net.
>
> I already looked at this review:
> http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2455 , but I would
> like to have more info about it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anton

The Turion and the Pentium M are very close in terms of power consumption
so go with the Turion.

http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/...

Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops,alt.comp.hardware (More info?)

On 11 Aug 2005, zip wrote:

>
> I really like the idea of having a 64bit system so I will be able to
> upgrade in the future (my laptop has to last at least 3 to 4 years)

i've had one that lasted that long and a used one that must be about
that old now. it's a thinkpad 560z.


> I am looking at the Compaq v2000z (Turion64) and the Compaq v2000
> (Pentium M). Does anybody have any battery run time data/comparison
> from these machines? Would I be losing a lot of battery time if I get
> the v2000z (Turion64)? I would like to have some user impressions from
> these machines, specially the Turion64 as it is harder to find info
> about it on the net.

64bit doesn't mean much unless you have a buttload of ram. can you
put 4gb in these laptops? and, considering the expense and battery
drain, do you want to? if not, it's not worth worrying about.


--
Barutan Seijin -- barutanseijin@gmail.com

Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops,alt.comp.hardware (More info?)

General Schvantzkoph wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:03:40 -0700, zip_56 wrote:
>
>> I'm planning on buying a Laptop and I'm facing a very difficult
>> choice: Should I go with AMD's Turion 64 or Pentium M ?
>>
>> I really like the idea of having a 64bit system so I will be able to
>> upgrade in the future (my laptop has to last at least 3 to 4 years), on
>> the other hand I hear that the Turion64 drains much more juice from the
>> battery than the Pentium M. I'm trying to find out if it is possible
>> to find a balance between in having the 64bit upgradeability of the
>> Turion64 and a good battery run time.
>>
>> I am looking at the Compaq v2000z (Turion64) and the Compaq v2000
>> (Pentium M). Does anybody have any battery run time data/comparison
>> from these machines? Would I be losing a lot of battery time if I get
>> the v2000z (Turion64)? I would like to have some user impressions from
>> these machines, specially the Turion64 as it is harder to find info
>> about it on the net.
>>
>> I already looked at this review:
>> http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2455 , but I would
>> like to have more info about it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Anton
>
> The Turion and the Pentium M are very close in terms of power consumption
> so go with the Turion.
>
>
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/...

That's not the whole story though. The processor is only one power
consumer. Intel has taken some pains to put together a chipset and
peripherals to match the low power consumption of the Pentium M while AMD
has concentrated on the processors and left the chipsets to third parties.
Far as I know there aren't any AMD64 chipsets optimized for low power, so
even if the power consumption of the processors is the same the power
consumption of the machine as a while may higher for the AMD.

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops,alt.comp.hardware (More info?)

On 11 Aug 2005 14:03:40 -0700, zip_56@hotmail.com wrote:

>I'm planning on buying a Laptop and I'm facing a very difficult
>choice: Should I go with AMD's Turion 64 or Pentium M ?
>
>I really like the idea of having a 64bit system so I will be able to
>upgrade in the future (my laptop has to last at least 3 to 4 years), on
>the other hand I hear that the Turion64 drains much more juice from the
>battery than the Pentium M. I'm trying to find out if it is possible
>to find a balance between in having the 64bit upgradeability of the
>Turion64 and a good battery run time.
>
>I am looking at the Compaq v2000z (Turion64) and the Compaq v2000
>(Pentium M). Does anybody have any battery run time data/comparison
>from these machines? Would I be losing a lot of battery time if I get
>the v2000z (Turion64)? I would like to have some user impressions from
>these machines, specially the Turion64 as it is harder to find info
>about it on the net.
>
>I already looked at this review:
>http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2455 , but I would
>like to have more info about it.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Anton

I have been pondering over the same question for some time now but
have just taken the plunge and got an Acer aspire 5024WMLi which is
Turion based. All I can say is I feel I have made the right choice -
it is by far the fastest laptop I have ever used - it copes with my
digital video editing with ease and this is probably the most
demanding thing I will ever use it for - and battery life is
sufficient for me at around 3 hours.

In my opinion - the Turion based systems are beter value for a given
specification.