Hi, I came across this article when researching on whether I should get 4X4G 16G pack of Ares or RipJaw.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/308402-30-skill-ripjaws-skill-ares
One thing that I do NOT like with the Ares is G.SKILL's recommended VCCIO/VCCSA voltage of 1.25v. On the SB-E/SB it's not recommended you exceed 1.20v, 1.00v is default, and >1.35v is proven to degrade the SB-E/SB CPU permanently. In contrast the new lines of Corsair are all tested with 1.10v with XMP.
First, personally I wouldn't buy anything (MOBO, RAM, SSD, HDD, etc) until the IB CPU is available AND then I would wait and let the (Guinea Pigs) Early Adopters work-out most all of the bugs and wait until there's at least one or better (2) BIOS revisions before buying!
Ares = Bad
Ripjaws X & Z = Good
IB = Get one of these kits - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Productcompare.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007611%20600006069%20600006127&IsNodeId=1&bop=And&CompareItemList=147%7C20-145-345%5E20-145-345-TS%2C20-231-445%5E20-231-445-TS%2C20-233-144%5E20-233-144-05%23%2C20-233-180%5E20-233-180-TS%2C20-233-147%5E20-233-147-TS
In the June System builder marathon: the following was said about "Ares = Bad":
So is which side is correct?
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/308402-30-skill-ripjaws-skill-ares
jaquith :
One thing that I do NOT like with the Ares is G.SKILL's recommended VCCIO/VCCSA voltage of 1.25v. On the SB-E/SB it's not recommended you exceed 1.20v, 1.00v is default, and >1.35v is proven to degrade the SB-E/SB CPU permanently. In contrast the new lines of Corsair are all tested with 1.10v with XMP.
First, personally I wouldn't buy anything (MOBO, RAM, SSD, HDD, etc) until the IB CPU is available AND then I would wait and let the (Guinea Pigs) Early Adopters work-out most all of the bugs and wait until there's at least one or better (2) BIOS revisions before buying!
Ares = Bad
Ripjaws X & Z = Good
IB = Get one of these kits - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Productcompare.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007611%20600006069%20600006127&IsNodeId=1&bop=And&CompareItemList=147%7C20-145-345%5E20-145-345-TS%2C20-231-445%5E20-231-445-TS%2C20-233-144%5E20-233-144-05%23%2C20-233-180%5E20-233-180-TS%2C20-233-147%5E20-233-147-TS
In the June System builder marathon: the following was said about "Ares = Bad":
For less than $60, G.Skill’s Ares-series DDR3-1600 C8 dual-channel 8 GB kit adds a performance kick to low-profile memory. This is probably the company’s best-kept secret, since our testing has shown similar overclocking capabilities between its Ares and better-known Ripjaws X modules.
So is which side is correct?