B bretlinton Distinguished Oct 11, 2010 1 0 18,510 Oct 11, 2010 #1 Anyone have a recommendation for a 48 port unmanaged switch - good or bad? this is strictly carrying data, does not have to be layer 3 or POE
Anyone have a recommendation for a 48 port unmanaged switch - good or bad? this is strictly carrying data, does not have to be layer 3 or POE
hang-the-9 Titan Mar 25, 2010 60,387 1,081 152,940 Oct 11, 2010 #2 Not many 48 port unmanaged switches, infact I could only fine one for sure. So as far as recomendations go, 1 of 1 is your pick. http://www.tp-link.com/products/productDetails.asp?class=switch&pmodel=TL%2DSG1048 http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/powerconnect-2848/pd?refid=switch-powerconnect-2848 looks to be managed, but is pretty cheap. I can't think of a business reason why a company would make a 48 port switch without any type of controls. The market for it would be maybe 10 people. Upvote 0 Downvote
Not many 48 port unmanaged switches, infact I could only fine one for sure. So as far as recomendations go, 1 of 1 is your pick. http://www.tp-link.com/products/productDetails.asp?class=switch&pmodel=TL%2DSG1048 http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/powerconnect-2848/pd?refid=switch-powerconnect-2848 looks to be managed, but is pretty cheap. I can't think of a business reason why a company would make a 48 port switch without any type of controls. The market for it would be maybe 10 people.
riser Illustrious Feb 17, 2001 14,175 0 40,960 Oct 12, 2010 #3 Without even looking at the links posted by HT9, I would expect the 48 port switch to cost significantly more. In addition it would be a single point of failure. I would recommend going with 2-24 port unmanaged switches. Upvote 0 Downvote
Without even looking at the links posted by HT9, I would expect the 48 port switch to cost significantly more. In addition it would be a single point of failure. I would recommend going with 2-24 port unmanaged switches.