Anyone recommend HP or Sony cameras?

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Bud Light" <budlight@email.invalid.com> wrote:

>Anyone really have a problem with these 2 companies?
>

Dunno. Depends on what you want to do with it I guess. I have had too
much foto fun with my Sony U50. It's tiny, it boots fast and is easy
on batteries. Goes everywhere, is loaned out and has not had any
breakdowns. The perfect 'instamatic' of the 2000s.

--
"A Sound Mind. A Healthy Body. Pick One" Mr. Hedge

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Bud Light wrote:
> Anyone really have a problem with these 2 companies?
>
>
>
I really like HP computers, but I feel that they are a bit new to
cameras for me. I stick with the old lines, like Kodak, Pentax, Nikon,
etc. That said, my neighbor sure likes her HP camera, and it makes
beautiful pictures.
Sony has good quality, but higher prices, and outrageously high prices
for memory sticks and other accessories.


--
Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

My Sony F828 has performed very well and like Scott said, I think that I
could shoe horses with it. I like a bigger camera.

"Scott W" <biphoto@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1111817550.824491.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Bud Light wrote:
>> Anyone really have a problem with these 2 companies?
> My Sony F828 has proven to be tough as nails.
>
> Scott
>