Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Upgrading from a Q9550 to a Quad Core i5/i7?

Last response: in CPUs
Share
November 22, 2011 11:36:06 PM

Hi guys,

I have been considering this for quite a while now, and I think it is time to start looking into what to do about my problem:

At the moment, my system is running 6GB DDR2 RAM (2GB of it from late 2007, and the other 4GB from late 2008) and an Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (Since September 2009).

I have been researching into DDR3 memory, and I have seen the difference in speed over DDR2, however the number of motherboards within a decent price range, from well known manufactures and with an LGA775 port are very small, so I think it is time to upgrade to an i5/i7 processor (I have heard they are much faster than the older Core 2 generation).

I have been looking into the Core i5, 2500k which has a clock speed of 3.33GHz.

How much different is this over my current Q9550, as I notice the Q9550 has 12MB L2 cache, but the 2500k doesn't have any?

Also, are the benefits I would get from upgrading be worth around £300? (I will be grabbing a new motherboard and 8GB DDR3 RAM clocked at 1666MHz).


What do you guys think?

Thanks for your answers
a b à CPUs
November 22, 2011 11:52:27 PM

Will it be? hard to say. It will greatly depend on what you're doing. Your general user experience will probably be smoother, but the difference won't be very noticeable until the CPU is really pushed. Thus, it would be more worth it it in workstation tasks than light gaming.

To put it in perspective for you, ANANDtech has an archive of benchmarks they update and can help you with this decision. There's some instances where the i5 2500k is nearly twice as fast as the C2 9550.

November 22, 2011 11:55:06 PM

That's good news at a glance.

I use this computer for just about everything - Image Editing, Gaming, Web use and Video Editing.

Thanks for the link by the way - It looks very useful!
Related resources
November 23, 2011 12:15:48 AM

To be honest I think you'll be dissapointed with the performance compared to how much the socket upgrade is gonna cost you.

The Core 2 Quad 9550 was one of the top Core 2 cpus and its still a good performer. In games for example the average gain will not be mindblowing - This is the reason I'm

still sporting my Q9550. I find the performance/price ratio low, since I need to get a new cpu, motherboard and DDR3 memory.

If money isn't an issue, then by all means go for it. But otherwise your Core 2 Quad will serve you well for the next couple of years, and by that time you can have quite the

performance jump for the same money.

Just my two cents ;) 
a c 471 à CPUs
November 23, 2011 12:16:26 AM

Click the following link which compares the performance improvement from a C2Q 9550 to a Core i5-2500k. Note that in some cases lower is better while in others higher is better.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/50?vs=288


Click the following link which compares the Core i5-2500k to the Core i7-2600k to determine if spending the extra ~$100 is worth it for the Core i7-2600k:

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/288?vs=287



EDIT:

Nevermind, I didn't notice the link was already provided.
November 23, 2011 12:23:36 AM

The comparison between the C2Q 9550 and the i5-2500k look quite big, while I don't think I could spend an extra ~$100 on an i7-2600k ;) .

What sort of performance jump could I expect if I was to upgrade the CPU & RAM (To DDR3, bearing in mind I'm using old Patriot DDR2 RAM here)?
a c 471 à CPUs
November 23, 2011 12:31:02 AM

Those benchmarks already take into consideration the difference in DDR2 and DDR3 RAM as part of the test rig used for the benchmarks.
November 23, 2011 12:36:44 AM

Ah right, okay. With the kind of budget I'm looking to spend (Around £300), would it be worth waiting for the next generation processors to come out then?
a c 471 à CPUs
November 23, 2011 1:40:58 AM

Ivy Bridge is not expected to be released for sale until March 2012. So if you can wait 4 months for benchmarks, then that would be the best option. The Q9550 is still a very capable CPU, especially if you overclock it. It is on par with Phenom II and Bulldozer CPUs. I'm still satisfied with my Q9450 OC'ed to 3.0GHz.

Current estimates of performance improvement (same clock speeds) range between 6% and 10% over Sandy Bridge. I am leaning towards 6% because Ivy Bridge will just tweak an already mature architecture core for better performance. Most of Intel's efforts is going towards Intel's next gen CPU; Haswell. The Ivy Bridge's die shrink should help boost clock speeds though.

In terms of pricing, I would say IB CPUs should be released at the same price points as how the SB CPUs are currently priced.

To answer your L2 cache question, the i5-2500k has 6MB cache.
November 23, 2011 1:43:14 AM

I think I will hold out until at least the Ivy Bridge processors are released. Thanks for your answers guys
!