Ram disk vs. SSD vs. CPU for increased transcoding speed?

in66732

Distinguished
Sep 4, 2011
49
0
18,530
Hello
I bought a television tuner or my computer and love it also love delaying television viewing by recording them in its very high quality HD format. The trouble is sometimes I would love to archive these recorded programs because they are so good, but the size of these files are about 4.7 GB per hour of HD recording. Consequently I am looking to transcode these files, however this will definitely necessitate a system upgrade to my system if I am to do it as much as I will like to.

On another forum I read an individual had very good results by using two hard drives instead of the one to transcode video files. This increased his speed a lot. So I asked the question would 2 ram disks increase your transcoding speed a lot? He did not know but referred me to an article on this site which can be found here. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ram-memory-upgrade,2778-3.html

I am thinking if one hour television programs require 4.7 GB of RAM per HD recording if you can create two 5 GB RAM disk in a new 16 GB system which also includes a CPU, SSB, maybe these two ram disks are the most important part of it for increasing transcoding speed. But I am not sure is money to increase transcoding speed best spent on CPU, SSB, or ram? The article I referred to above did not have all the answers for me.
 

in66732

Distinguished
Sep 4, 2011
49
0
18,530

OK

well is this something this person at this thread on another forum said that can be found here http://discussions.virtualdr.com/showthread.php?p=1376817#post1376817
which doesn't quite apply to ram disks? He first said



He later said
 

dalaran

Distinguished
Jun 7, 2011
180
0
18,710
Makes senses for HDDs which have limited tranfer rates by device and controller, but for ram drives it doesn't really apply, splitting the ramdrive in 2 won't make any difference as far as speed is concerned, both drive would be sharing the same resources.