How my first Gaming Rig will perform in Metro 2033?

[rickytrux11]

Specs-
GPU- Radeon HD 6590 1GB
Cpu- Phenom II X4 955
8GB DDR3 RAM

Res-1600*900(not going to upgrade)

So, how much FPS will i get in Metro 2033 in Maximum settimgs with full AA and others?

 

[browsingtheworld]

It would probably give you 60 fps with vsync on at that resolution. If it doesn't overclock the CPU.

 

[bluesc]

With full AA? ~25-30

That could be very inaccurate, but @1680x1050 with 0xAA on a 6950, you only get ~40

 

[browsingtheworld]

http://www.techspot.com/review/349-amd-radeon-6950/page10.html

57 fps average.

 

[rickytrux11]

What about crysis?

 

[rickytrux11]

http://www.techspot.com/review/349-amd-radeon-6950/page10.html

57 fps average.

thanks, but my model will be 1GB.

 

[browsingtheworld]

It'll give you the exact save performance in Metro 2033.

Crysis 2 is a console port and a joke for the 6950.

 

[bluesc]

http://www.techspot.com/review/349-amd-radeon-6950/page10.html

57 fps average.

Ahh, correct. Didn't realise the benchmark I was looking at had 4xAA.

 

[rickytrux11]

It'll give you the exact save performance in Metro 2033.

Crysis 2 is a console port and a joke for the 6950.

does crysis 1 require less resource than metro 2033?

 

[mdd1963]

Crysis and Metro are *the* GPU benchmarks of this decade, and will likely remain so for 2-5 more years....

 

[browsingtheworld]

Crysis and Metro are *the* GPU benchmarks of this decade, and will likely remain so for 2-5 more years....

Witcher 2 says hi.

Crysis 1 isn't that demanding. Still inefficient but it'll run smoothly on a GTX 460 maxed out, much less a 6950.

 

[celpas]

Witcher 2 says hi.

Crysis 1 isn't that demanding. Still inefficient but it'll run smoothly on a GTX 460 maxed out, much less a 6950.

I am tired of seeing you posting"the gtx 460 maxes...the gtx 460 maxes that".My friend owns a gtx 460 and his fps is similar to my gtx 275 in crysis.With the 460 he can max out the game but he has to keep shaders on high.Witcher 2 is only demamding if you enable ubersampling.My GTX 275 maxes out withcer 2 without any problems BUT with ubersampling disabled.Besides I don't see a difference with it on.Crysis is still the most demanding game of all time after metro 2033.

 

[browsingtheworld]

I am tired of seeing you posting"the gtx 460 maxes...the gtx 460 maxes that".My friend owns a gtx 460 and his fps is similar to my gtx 275 in crysis.With the 460 he can max out the game but he has to keep shaders on high.Witcher 2 is only demamding if you enable ubersampling.My GTX 275 maxes out withcer 2 without any problems BUT with ubersampling disabled.Besides I don't see a difference with it on.Crysis is still the most demanding game of all time after metro 2033.

What the hell.I clicked submit and server posted by message 3 times.lol

So the 460 can max out Crysis...

Obviously if Witcher 2 uses ubersampling it's more demanding than Crysis so it's not the second most demanding game of all time.

I like how "your friend" has become a reliable source.

Here's benchmarks for Crysis Warhead at 1680x1050, a resolution higher than what he will use.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3809/nvidias-geforce-gtx-460-the-200-king/6
Looks pretty playable to me.

 

[celpas]

So the 460 can max out Crysis...

Obviously if Witcher 2 uses ubersampling it's more demanding than Crysis so it's not the second most demanding game of all time.

I like how "your friend" has become a reliable source.

Here's benchmarks for Crysis Warhead at 1680x1050, a resolution higher than what he will use.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3809/nvidias-geforce-gtx-460-the-200-king/6
Looks pretty playable to me.

Oh yeah?If you would have looked closely at the benchmarks you would have found that they have benched the gpu with gamer quality but with enthusiast shaders.That's not max setting.I feel that everything maxed but shaders high will give better quality.In any case your benchmarks just confirmed that the gtx 460 cannot max crysis.My gtx 275 and core i7 870 are slightly slower than a gtx 460 but crysis is UNPLAYABLE even at 1680X1050 if you put everything on very high in dx 10.dx9 does make it playable but in ice levels the game will lag you out.Its obivous that you haven't played crysis on a gtx 460.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2009/09/22/amds_ati_radeon_hd_5870_video_card_review/9

EVEN A 5870 has trouble playing crysis at 1080p.At 1680X1050 the fps will be around 30-32 which is playable.A 5870 is a minimum to max out crysis even at 1680X1050.Just look at your benchmarks before posting

 

[celpas]

So the 460 can max out Crysis...

Obviously if Witcher 2 uses ubersampling it's more demanding than Crysis so it's not the second most demanding game of all time.

I like how "your friend" has become a reliable source.

Here's benchmarks for Crysis Warhead at 1680x1050, a resolution higher than what he will use.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3809/nvidias-geforce-gtx-460-the-200-king/6
Looks pretty playable to me.

http://www.geforce.com/#/Optimize/Guides/witcher-2-tweak-guide

The graph shows that UberSampling is by far the single most demanding setting in The Witcher 2, reducing FPS by around 60% at each resolution. In fact no current single GPU setup can run TW2 with UberSampling smoothly at higher settings. UberSampling therefore is designed primarily for high-end multi-GPU configurations, and also future single GPUs. Given that it provides only a slight improvement in image quality for a massive hit in terms of performance, UberSampling is the first setting all users should consider disabling before moving on to examine the performance impact of any other settings.

even a gtx 590 has trouble with ubersampling.I consider the setting not optimised well because even on a gtx 580 you get 22-23 fps when enabling it

 

[browsingtheworld]

Oh yeah?If you would have looked closely at the benchmarks you would have found that they have benched the gpu with gamer quality but with enthusiast shaders.That's not max setting.I feel that everything maxed but shaders high will give better quality.In any case your benchmarks just confirmed that the gtx 460 cannot max crysis.My gtx 275 and core i7 870 are slightly slower than a gtx 460 but crysis is UNPLAYABLE even at 1680X1050 if you put everything on very high in dx 10.dx9 does make it playable but in ice levels the game will lag you out.Its obivous that you haven't played crysis on a gtx 460.

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2009/09/22/amds_ati_radeon_hd_5870_video_card_review/9

EVEN A 5870 has trouble playing crysis at 1080p.At 1680X1050 the fps will be around 30-32 which is playable.A 5870 is a minimum to max out crysis even at 1680X1050.Just look at your benchmarks before posting

Again, you are not a source

The benchmark shows a different video card on at a different resolution, I fail to see how that's relevant. I already linked a benchmark where the 460 had 41 fps at 1680x1050.

The graph shows that UberSampling is by far the single most demanding setting in The Witcher 2

So Witcher 2 with ubersampling on is one of the most demanding 3D games therefore it's a better benchmark than Crysis 2.

The game that gives you less frames is the more demanding benchmark. Witcher 2 with ubersampling on gives you less frames than Crysis therefore it's a more demanding benchmark. Your personal opinion about efficiency has nothing to do with it.

 

[celpas]

Again, you are not a source

The benchmark shows a different video card on at a different resolution, I fail to see how that's relevant. I already linked a benchmark where the 460 had 41 fps at 1680x1050.

The graph shows that UberSampling is by far the single most demanding setting in The Witcher 2

So Witcher 2 with ubersampling on is one of the most demanding 3D games therefore it's a better benchmark than Crysis 2.

The game that gives you less frames is the more demanding benchmark. Witcher 2 with ubersampling on gives you less frames than Crysis therefore it's a more demanding benchmark. Your personal opinion about efficiency has nothing to do with it.

Crysis 1 isn't that demanding. Still inefficient but it'll run smoothly on a GTX 460 maxed out

http://www.anandtech.com/show/3809/nvidias-geforce-gtx-460-the-200-king/6
In the benchmark the game isn't maxed out.Secondly I think you haven't ever played crysis before because you don't realize that the shaders setting in the game is A WHOPPING FPS KILLER.The fps impact is even greater than 16XAA in warhead and the image quality improvement is also considerably improved.If you increase that setting to max and lower everything down to high including AA of course the game will run at 41 fps.But you will get tremendous pop in at gamer(I have tried gamer object detail personally and enthusiast object detail.The water quality is degraded as is shadow quality.Using those settings of course the gtx 460 gets 41 fps.My oced 275 gets 40-50 on those very settings.You posted above 2 times that the 460 will max out crysis but the benchmark you posted obivously shows that to run crysis at an acceptable frame rate you need to lower pretty much all settings to gamer.

As far as my link is concerned I showed you that since a 5870 maxes out crysis at 1080p with only 26 fps its only logical to assume that it will get 31-32 fps at 1680X1050.Now the 460 even highly oced is nowhere near a 5870 which is close to a gtx 480.Getting 41 fps WITH ALL SETTINGS AT ENTHUSIAST is called maxing out a game.

BTW as far as witcher 2 is concerned there is no point in benchmarking the game as EVEN dual gpu monsters like 6990 and 590 can't access ubersamping.The settings is plainly unoptimised pure and simple.If you take such unoptimised games into accounts gta 4 is even more demanding than crysis because even now it still runs at 25-30 fps on the very best pcs.

 

[celpas]

Heres the chart which shows where a 460 stands.Its only 5% faster than a gtx 275 896mb.Mine is a gtx 275 1792mb which means that my card is nearly as powerful as a 460

 

[rickytrux11]

Okay guys keep on posting.

Btw i think the 6950 can max out metro and crysis, isnt it?

But in any of the benchmark the name of the Processor is not given. So, will my processor be enough to max out those games? Cause my phenom 955 is not as much as powerful as i5 2500 though. I cannot afford it also. So am confused here.

 

[celpas]

Okay guys keep on posting.

Btw i think the 6950 can max out metro and crysis, isnt it?

But in any of the benchmark the name of the Processor is not given. So, will my processor be enough to max out those games? Cause my phenom 955 is not as much as powerful as i5 2500 though. I cannot afford it also. So am confused here.

metro 2033 as not at all cpu dependant unless you turn on physx.At your resolution you should be able to play metro at very high with tesselation but no depth of field and anti aliasing.You can max out crysis with 8X AA

 

[rickytrux11]

but wont any game realease within 2yrs which will require more than metro? The witcher 2 already require more than 5750.

 

[NeoFirenX]

The 6950 is a beast, it can handle both Crysis and Metro 2033 maxed out with 45-55 fps, but not 60.
But with full AA, and 1600x900, you may see some hiccups. At 1600x900 even 2x AA is enough and if you want full 60 fps smooth gameplay, then I would suggest you to overclock it a little bit.
For other less demanding games, the 6950 can give you 60 fps easily.

 

[rickytrux11]

okay. Thanks you kow its price?

 

[NeoFirenX]

http://shop.ebay.in/?_from=R40&_trksid=m570&_nkw=hd+6950&_sacat=See-All-Categories

There you go.
Try searching for prices yourself....saves time and adds experience.

 

[rickytrux11]

but bro, on lynx its only rs13500.