Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Crysis 2 system specs

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
July 2, 2011 6:38:06 AM

i :hello:  am having intel dual core cpu overclocked at 3.4 ghz cpu :bounce: 

2gb ddr2 ram ati radeon hd 5450 1gb ddr3 graphic card

graphic card specs

memory clocked at:755mhz

gpu engine clockede at 751mhz

shader ver 5.0

iam able to play call of duty black ops with all max setting witout any lag

will iable to pay crysis 2 with medium settings will do? pls tell me :( 
before i start downloding it :sweat: 

More about : crysis system specs

July 2, 2011 6:40:09 AM

i :hello:  am having intel dual core cpu overclocked at 3.4 ghz cpu

2gb ddr2 ram ati radeon hd 5450 1gb ddr3 graphic card

graphic card specs

memory clocked at:755mhz

gpu engine clockede at 751mhz

shader ver 5.0

iam able to play call of duty black ops with all max setting witout any lag

will iable to pay crysis 2 with medium settings will do? pls tell me
befor i start downloding it
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
July 2, 2011 7:41:42 AM

Black Ops- MAYBE Medium Settings with little lag
Crysis 2- Not a chance
m
0
l
Related resources
a b U Graphics card
July 2, 2011 9:01:02 AM

I am supprised that you can play black ops on high with that system :o , you must be playing at a really low resolution?, I would say that you would be fine with crysis 2 on medium/low, that's if you are playing that a low resolution though
m
0
l
July 2, 2011 9:20:03 AM

i hafe a radeon 4670HD end i play on max so you can play on max too
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
July 2, 2011 9:50:58 AM

what is your monitor resolution?
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
July 2, 2011 10:23:07 AM

Did quick searching on youtube, and they act like you can play it. It's supposed to be demanding.

I will say though, on Battlefield Bad Company 2, that game is very demanding also, and I had trouble running it smoothly with my old Athlon dual core and a GTS 450.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
July 2, 2011 12:51:10 PM

at what resolution you are playing, at 1024x768, this card can crank pretty high settings in crysis 2 and can get 30+ fps.
m
0
l
July 2, 2011 8:19:17 PM

But can it play crysis (again) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
m
0
l
July 3, 2011 3:27:29 PM

its funny how some ppl always ignore monitor resolutions when talking about games they say they can run :??: 
m
0
l
July 10, 2011 8:03:17 AM

My screen resolutn is 1360*1260 with all antialising 16x with all bullet impact and shadow on
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
July 10, 2011 8:06:02 AM

you can play crysis 2 on high settings(which is actually lowest in the game) with 30+fps.
m
0
l
July 10, 2011 8:30:46 AM

Quote:
at what resolution you are playing, at 1024x768, this card can crank pretty high settings in crysis 2 and can get 30+ fps.

i am having a screen res of 1360*1260 and i am able to play call of duty black ops with maximum setting like anti aliasing 16x bullet impct and shadow on with smooth fps without any lag will crysis do
m
0
l
a c 272 U Graphics card
a b à CPUs
July 10, 2011 8:56:13 AM

This next topics has been merged by Mousemonkey
  • Crysis 2 system requirement
    m
    0
    l
    July 13, 2011 12:39:17 PM

    adam_x_brookes said:
    I am supprised that you can play black ops on high with that system :o , you must be playing at a really low resolution?, I would say that you would be fine with crysis 2 on medium/low, that's if you are playing that a low resolution though

    low resolution means iam playing black ops at 1368*1068
    with all anti alising feature and shadow etc on
    m
    0
    l
    a b U Graphics card
    July 13, 2011 12:42:10 PM

    chetank628 said:
    low resolution means iam playing black ops at 1368*1068
    with all anti alising feature and shadow etc on

    lol.you must be able to tolerate low frame rates.I can't tolerate anything less than 25 fps.If you could stand playing black ops at max at that resolution,you could play crysis 2 on very high with similar frame rates
    m
    0
    l
    July 13, 2011 12:43:44 PM

    op8 said:
    its funny how some ppl always ignore monitor resolutions when talking about games they say they can run :??: 

    only the resolution doesnt matter u can see the whole game in clarity at 1024*768 provided the game dopesnt lag :fou: 
    if ur able to play the game at wiyhout any lag then u can run it
    m
    0
    l
    July 13, 2011 12:50:05 PM

    celpas said:
    lol.you must be able to tolerate low frame rates.I can't tolerate anything less than 25 fps.If you could stand playing black ops at max at that resolution,you could play crysis 2 on very high with similar frame rates

    the game doesnt lag at all idont even tolerate those laggy games they just frustrate me

    m
    0
    l
    July 16, 2011 11:32:16 PM

    chetank628 said:
    only the resolution doesnt matter u can see the whole game in clarity at 1024*768 provided the game dopesnt lag :fou: 
    if ur able to play the game at wiyhout any lag then u can run it




    yes you are right but you are completely misssing my point....(which btw wasn't aimed at you in particular).


    ......i just find it funny when i keep reading post after post on forums, you tube, etc etc where ppl claim that they run games MAXED out with wicked FPS but neglect to mention they are playing on low rez's (like 1024X768,1280X1024,1600X900 etc.)

    ....like i said this isnt a dig at you, its just an observation ;) 
    m
    0
    l
    July 18, 2011 11:33:06 AM

    op8 said:
    yes you are right but you are completely misssing my point....(which btw wasn't aimed at you in particular).


    ......i just find it funny when i keep reading post after post on forums, you tube, etc etc where ppl claim that they run games MAXED out with wicked FPS but neglect to mention they are playing on low rez's (like 1024X768,1280X1024,1600X900 etc.)

    ....like i said this isnt a dig at you, its just an observation ;) 

    if u maxed out the game to ur maximum pc setting all monitor doesnt have hd resolution if they can run the game with their maximum resolution wth out any lag means they CAN RUN IT
    m
    0
    l
    a b U Graphics card
    July 18, 2011 12:04:13 PM

    chetank628 said:
    the game doesnt lag at all idont even tolerate those laggy games they just frustrate me

    download FRAPS.Run it.Start Black ops go into actual gameplay and report the figure you generally get on the top left of your screen
    m
    0
    l
    a b U Graphics card
    July 18, 2011 12:06:20 PM

    op8 said:
    yes you are right but you are completely misssing my point....(which btw wasn't aimed at you in particular).


    ......i just find it funny when i keep reading post after post on forums, you tube, etc etc where ppl claim that they run games MAXED out with wicked FPS but neglect to mention they are playing on low rez's (like 1024X768,1280X1024,1600X900 etc.)

    ....like i said this isnt a dig at you, its just an observation ;) 

    1600X900 a low resolution? :lol:  .That resolution is slightly less than 1680X1050 which is a pretty demanding resolution
    m
    0
    l
    a b U Graphics card
    a b à CPUs
    July 18, 2011 12:52:25 PM

    chetank628 said:
    if u maxed out the game to ur maximum pc setting all monitor doesnt have hd resolution if they can run the game with their maximum resolution wth out any lag means they CAN RUN IT

    Resolution is part of "maxing out" a a game imo. 1920x1080 is way more demanding than the resolutions you play at. hell, i can max out the first crysis @ 60 fps locked if i only play in 1280x720. that isnt a fair assessment though at that resolution to what my computer can actually do.
    m
    0
    l
    July 20, 2011 2:20:40 PM

    chetank628 said:
    if u maxed out the game to ur maximum pc setting all monitor doesnt have hd resolution if they can run the game with their maximum resolution wth out any lag means they CAN RUN IT



    Obviously i'm not getting thru to you properly.

    My point was.............playing at any resolution below 1920X1080P is NOT MAXING OUT A GAME

    I never disagreed with you about your constant mentioning that if a game doesnt lag the pc can run it...

    What part of that dont you understand?

    I'm pretty sure I'm making myself crystal clear and yet you still came back with a pointless reply repeating what you had said earlier?

    m
    0
    l
    July 20, 2011 2:30:37 PM

    celpas said:
    1600X900 a low resolution? :lol:  .That resolution is slightly less than 1680X1050 which is a pretty demanding resolution




    its not high rez is it??
    if i used that rez on my games i would think they looked like poop, even with full AA,AF,full shadows blah blah blah.....but wtf eh? i would get bad ass 150 PLUS FPS so who cares right?? LOL :kaola: 
    m
    0
    l
    a b U Graphics card
    July 20, 2011 3:01:46 PM

    op8 said:
    Obviously i'm not getting thru to you properly.

    My point was.............playing at any resolution below 1920X1080P is NOT MAXING OUT A GAME

    I never disagreed with you about your constant mentioning that if a game doesnt lag the pc can run it...

    What part of that dont you understand?

    I'm pretty sure I'm making myself crystal clear and yet you still came back with a pointless reply repeating what you had said earlier?


    Well technically, you can go about as high as 5760X1080P. So by your logic, 1920x1080P is NOT maxing out a game either.
    m
    0
    l
    July 20, 2011 3:19:55 PM

    phishy714 said:
    Well technically, you can go about as high as 5760X1080P. So by your logic, 1920x1080P is NOT maxing out a game either.




    technically,yes!
    But as you can see here, link to steam survey, 1920X1080 is the most popular rez by far.
    Even ppl that play at 2560X1440 equate to just 0.68%!!!(compared to over 21% with 1920X1080P)....so in reality your point is pointless,lol.


    ....i'm actually surprised that the Radeon HD 5450(fourth from bottom), which is a budget level card, along with just 2Gb of ddr2, can even produce playable framerates at those resolutions "maxed out".
    My 5yr old laptop has a better card and specs than that, and would be unplayable at high settings IMO.
    m
    0
    l
    September 18, 2011 10:24:48 AM

    op8 said:
    technically,yes!
    But as you can see here, link to steam survey, 1920X1080 is the most popular rez by far.
    Even ppl that play at 2560X1440 equate to just 0.68%!!!(compared to over 21% with 1920X1080P)....so in reality your point is pointless,lol.


    ....i'm actually surprised that the Radeon HD 5450(fourth from bottom), which is a budget level card, along with just 2Gb of ddr2, can even produce playable framerates at those resolutions "maxed out".
    My 5yr old laptop has a better card and specs than that, and would be unplayable at high settings IMO.


    ok ur five year laptop have i7 procesor or what? beating the dual cores let me know ur laptop specs then it must have atleat 16gb of ram and must having a screen resolution of 1080i ur laptop must be made by some special company that it can beat 1.5 yr old pcs then it must cost in lakhs before five yrs
    m
    0
    l
    !