Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Why did Microsoft call it Windows

Last response: in Windows 8
Share

Why call it windows? Is that to confuse the Market. Why not call it what it is 'Apps 8' or I think they were going to call it Metro.

It certainly isn't windows as many expect. There is a desktop of sorts but you need a third party program to make it act like the old desktop. There is a rush at the moment to buy old windows 7 pc's new or refurbished.

They never listened to the feed back on windows vista and haven't for this bodge of an OS. Should we now say goodbye Microsoft's CEO??

More about : microsoft call windows

I remember Windows 1 came out after the Macintosh was cutting into MS's market share. Gates did not like the competition. Of course the Mac was cloned from the Lisa which was losely based on the Xerox Alto. Microsoft wanted a short, catchy name and therefore "Windows". It didn't work worth a darn until version 3.1. Now we have 8 which is OK when you get used to it.

zdbc13 said:
I remember Windows 1 came out after the Macintosh was cutting into MS's market share. Gates did not like the competition. Of course the Mac was cloned from the Lisa which was losely based on the Xerox Alto. Microsoft wanted a short, catchy name and therefore "Windows". It didn't work worth a darn until version 3.1. Now we have 8 which is OK when you get used to it.



Nice one. I know the history if the Windows operating system but why call something that is inherently a different style of OS with the old name. It is for a different market sector so should be given a different name
Related ressources

I ran OS/2 for a while and even OS/2 for Windows. Great OS at the time, but hard (and expensive) to find apps and it was a pain to support. Still, it was a great tool, at the time, to bring forth one's inner geek.

Just think if IBM had taken what they started with OS/2 and then combined it with early Linux development as an open source product....

COLGeek said:
I ran OS/2 for a while and even OS/2 for Windows. Great OS at the time, but hard (and expensive) to find apps and it was a pain to support. Still, it was a great tool, at the time, to bring forth one's inner geek.

Just think if IBM had taken what they started with OS/2 and then combined it with early Linux development as an open source product....



Microsoft didn't bail on it. It was a joint development and Gates went off on his own. OS/2 was a very good OS initially as good as windows but Gates was the business side and did his marketing better. He jumped most of the basic windows from others because some wasn't patented quick enough and others were open source.

As I recall, MS (Bill Gates) had an agreement with IBM to share the work up through Windows 3.xx, but when MS went down the Win 9x path, OS/2 was put aside.

It was certainly a business decision on the part of MS. Can't say that I blame them, but it did effectively kill off OS/2 as a consumer OS.

Yes, IBM used it for proprietary stuff for a while (maybe they still do) but it died out quick. That's when MS got serious about NT and Server, and look where it leads to now? I still think Windows 7/8 are just newer versions of NT with a few bells and whistles....
!