Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Jeff Alu wrote:
> Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all shots taken
> with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in Photoshop:
>
>
> http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm >
>
> Thanks and hope you enjoy,
>
>
> Jeff T. Alu
>
>
>
>
Well, just my opinion, but I would have deleted most of those after review.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Why would you delete them Ron?
Jeff
Ron Hunter wrote:
> Jeff Alu wrote:
> > Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all
shots taken
> > with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in
Photoshop:
> >
> >
> > http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm > >
> >
> > Thanks and hope you enjoy,
> >
> >
> > Jeff T. Alu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Well, just my opinion, but I would have deleted most of those after
review.
>
>
> --
> Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
animalu@animalu.com wrote:
> Why would you delete them Ron?
>
> Jeff
>
> Ron Hunter wrote:
> > Jeff Alu wrote:
> > > Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all
> shots taken
> > > with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in
> Photoshop:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks and hope you enjoy,
> > >
> > >
> > > Jeff T. Alu
Jeff,
You look like you are persueing a vision, better than most folks on
this list. A little heavy on the red filter effects, the contrast could
come down a little , and you maybe loosing a little due to inferior
cameras (look for a camera with a better lens). But I like it again you
have a style that seems to be working.
Tom
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Well, just my opinion, but I would have deleted most of those after
> review.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Your work is very good, Jeff. It captures something of the "otherness" of
the desert.
I also like your refreshing approach to photogrraphy:
For me, the cameras are merely data gathering devices and all of the real
work is done after the fact. Also, I don't use a tripod and very rarely
wait for the right lighting, etc. I usually take my photos while hiking
around and as soon as I see something, I just point and click.
Speaking as someone who rarely takes a shot without a tripod this unmeasured
approach of yours is slightly startling. However, you get the results, you
have a good eye and that is all that matters.
Thanks for the link.
John,
Ireland
"Jeff Alu" <animalu@animalu.com> wrote in message
news:M_d2e.1763$x4.1195@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all shots
> taken
> with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in Photoshop:
>
>
> http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm >
>
> Thanks and hope you enjoy,
>
>
> Jeff T. Alu
>
>
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:49:29 -0600, Ron Hunter <rphunter@charter.net>
wrote:
>Jeff Alu wrote:
>> Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all shots taken
>> with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in Photoshop:
>>
>>
>> http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm >>
>>
>> Thanks and hope you enjoy,
>>
>>
>> Jeff T. Alu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Well, just my opinion, but I would have deleted most of those after review.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Ron Hunter wrote:
> Jeff Alu wrote:
>
>> Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all shots
>> taken
>> with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in Photoshop:
>>
>>
>> http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm >>
>>
>> Thanks and hope you enjoy,
>>
>>
>> Jeff T. Alu
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Well, just my opinion, but I would have deleted most of those after review.
>
>
I'm guessing that if Jeff were to lie out his A$$ and say he used
expensive gear some folks might suddenly change their tune.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Ron Hunter" <rphunter@charter.net> wrote in message
news:uGf2e.20298$9P5.8645@fe07.lga...
> Jeff Alu wrote:
> > Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all shots
taken
> > with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in
Photoshop:
> >
> >
> > http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm > >
> Well, just my opinion, but I would have deleted most of those after
review.
>
While defending to the death your right to hold it, I personally disagree
with your opinion.
I like, and always have, his work, and more power to him for using a mere
2mpx DC280, which was my first digital camera. I wish I could render
monochrome as well as that. Well done Jeff.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
as a dabbler in amature photography I appreciate your eye for potentially
good shots in mono , not everything can make a good black and white shot,
there are a lot of great shots on your site and as the previous post said
its a very refreshing approach .
Great stuff.
"carrigman" <carrigman@deathtospammershotmail.com> wrote in message
news2c4ui$3vt$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
> Your work is very good, Jeff. It captures something of the "otherness" of
> the desert.
>
> I also like your refreshing approach to photogrraphy:
>
> For me, the cameras are merely data gathering devices and all of the real
> work is done after the fact. Also, I don't use a tripod and very rarely
> wait for the right lighting, etc. I usually take my photos while hiking
> around and as soon as I see something, I just point and click.
>
> Speaking as someone who rarely takes a shot without a tripod this
> unmeasured approach of yours is slightly startling. However, you get the
> results, you have a good eye and that is all that matters.
>
> Thanks for the link.
>
> John,
> Ireland
>
>
>
> "Jeff Alu" <animalu@animalu.com> wrote in message
> news:M_d2e.1763$x4.1195@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all shots
>> taken
>> with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in Photoshop:
>>
>>
>> http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm >>
>>
>> Thanks and hope you enjoy,
>>
>>
>> Jeff T. Alu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
There's some very strong work here. There's an awful lot to look at for one
site, though. I think if you pared down the weaker third of your material
it would be better. The best ones are really extraordinary and show a grasp
of B&W that few photographers seem to have any more.
I'd be interested in hearing how you do your rgb > grayscale conversions.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
animalu@animalu.com wrote:
> Why would you delete them Ron?
>
> Jeff
>
> Ron Hunter wrote:
>
>>Jeff Alu wrote:
>>
>>>Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all
>
> shots taken
>
>>>with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in
>
> Photoshop:
>
>>>
>>>http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks and hope you enjoy,
>>>
>>>
>>>Jeff T. Alu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Well, just my opinion, but I would have deleted most of those after
>
> review.
>
>>
>>--
>>Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net
>
>
Mainly because several of them are so motion-blurred as to represent
nothing I find worthwhile. If this is the OP's idea of 'artistic
expression' he is welcome to it. NOT my cup of tea.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
<animalu@animalu.com> wrote in message
news:1112116314.535135.215190@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Why would you delete them Ron?
>
> Jeff
>
> Ron Hunter wrote:
>> Jeff Alu wrote:
>> > Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all
> shots taken
>> > with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in
> Photoshop:
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm >> >
>> >
>> > Thanks and hope you enjoy,
>> >
>> >
>> > Jeff T. Alu
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> Well, just my opinion, but I would have deleted most of those after
> review.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net
>
Jeff, where did you shoot that one called "Arch?" I've prowled around the
Salton Sea looking for locations, but I've never seen that one.
Nice work, by the way. A little heavy on some of the effects, IMHO, but
overall very good.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Hi Tom, I do some pretty heavy dodging and burning with the dodge and
burn brush in Photoshop. That's what is giving it the red filter look.
When doing so, it can push things toward pure black and pure white,
and takes out the mids. Gives it that extreme look which I'm going
after.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Hi John, thanks for checking out my work. I find that since most of my
shots are taken during midday (in very bright daylight) a tripod isn't
necessary and just gets in the way. As things edge toward dusk, I
might break a tripod out. I recently bought one for a nighttime
wedding shoot. Couldn't have survived with out it...but instead of
actually setting it up for each shot, I just proped it (fully folded
and with legs only slightly extended) on my upper thigh and that was
plenty stable enough.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I keep going back and fourth on weather or not to "get rid" of some of
the lesser shots. I like the idea of keeping the lesser ones, because
it shows my progression and change of style over time. But eventually,
I may have to take some down, maybe create a "older style" section...
You can read all about my rgb>grayscale conversions on my process page:
Near the bottom of the page, just click the right side of the mini-arch
photo to reveal the location...It's just west of the town of Niland.
While you're there, be sure to head south on the road between the arch
and the Sea just a couple of blocks, and you'll come across the mud
volcanos on your left...Well worth the stop.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
<animalu@animalu.com> wrote in message
news:1112304941.732428.321530@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hi Skip, the location of the Arch shot can be found on my locations
> page:
>
> http://www.animalu.com/pics/locations.htm >
> Near the bottom of the page, just click the right side of the mini-arch
> photo to reveal the location...It's just west of the town of Niland.
> While you're there, be sure to head south on the road between the arch
> and the Sea just a couple of blocks, and you'll come across the mud
> volcanos on your left...Well worth the stop.
>
> Jeff
>
Thanks! I've bookmarked the page separately from the rest. I shot some
nudes in Bombay Beach last August, in those abandoned trailers on the shore.
105F that day...
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:54:36 GMT, in rec.photo.digital , "Jeff Alu"
<animalu@animalu.com> in
<M_d2e.1763$x4.1195@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> wrote:
>Stop on by and check out my digital black and white photos, all shots taken
>with Kodak DC280 and Minolta DImage F300 Cameras, processed in Photoshop:
>
>
>http://www.animalu.com/pics/photos.htm
>
>
>Thanks and hope you enjoy,
I don't think that these pictures benefit from electronic viewing. You
seem to appreciate the texture of the photos and that does not look
right on a screen. I bet that properly done prints, with the
appropriate paper, look quite good. They demand more than a quick
glance.
--
Matt Silberstein
All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Hi Matt, actually I've come to like my photos better on the screen than
in print. I like the illumination you get from a screen, prints look
fine, but to me don't have the same intensity, and are not quite as
"loud"
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
<animalu@animalu.com> wrote in message
news:1112379500.105241.117600@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Wow, Bombay Beach nudes, eh? I'll bet they enjoyed that trip.
> Certainly not the most glamorous spot on the earth >
> Jeff
>
The girl I worked with loves that sort of stuff, she's really into getting
that gritty type of image. Of course, she wasn't too thrilled with the
smell of dead fish... ;-)
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.