Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)
Thanks. I have signed up with Beyond Wireless. Unfortunately, the AT&T TDMA
reception is poor in my area. My phones are Nokia 5165 and Motorola
V60t. Should I try another phone such as Nokia 8260?
"Lena" <lenagainster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1117754068.401067.264150@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Nokia 8260, 8265
>
> While you're considering ATT TDMA, look at the prepay plan called
> Beyond Wireless
>
> http://www.gobeyondwireless.com/ >
> If you live in the coverage area, the rates are the best, the airtime
> never expires.
>
> Lena
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:55:30 GMT, "John Smith" <someone@microsoft.com>
wrote:
>Thanks. I have signed up with Beyond Wireless. Unfortunately, the AT&T TDMA
>reception is poor in my area. My phones are Nokia 5165 and Motorola
>V60t. Should I try another phone such as Nokia 8260?
Those are good phones. If you cannot get good reception with those
it's unlikely that you're going to get appreciably better with another
such as the 8260.
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)
Given the limited coverage by each cell phone tower, I'm not sure what
one means by "poor in my area". I get poor reception in my house,
about 1 bar on the Nokia scale, but if I walk outside, it goes up to 2
to 3 bars. A quarter mile from my house, I get all four bars. Inside
Kohl's, 1 bar if I'm lucky; outside, 3 bars. Overall, coverage is
good, but there are some weak spots. What I consider "poor" is areas
where the phone says "extended area" or "roam", and I am paying 4 times
the regular rate. But these areas are well defined on the Beyond
Wireless coverage map.
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)
John Smith wrote:
> Thanks. I have signed up with Beyond Wireless. Unfortunately, the AT&T TDMA
> reception is poor in my area. My phones are Nokia 5165 and Motorola
> V60t. Should I try another phone such as Nokia 8260?
>
Back a few years ago when I was on AT&T, the Panasonic Versio had 1-2
bars better reception than most other AT&T phones. It looks like it is
still available on beyond's web site.
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)
Agreed.
In my case, "poor" also means "extended area" or "roam". However, according
to Beyond Wireless, my area should be well covered.
"Lena" <lenagainster@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118486746.190400.172670@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Given the limited coverage by each cell phone tower, I'm not sure what
> one means by "poor in my area". I get poor reception in my house,
> about 1 bar on the Nokia scale, but if I walk outside, it goes up to 2
> to 3 bars. A quarter mile from my house, I get all four bars. Inside
> Kohl's, 1 bar if I'm lucky; outside, 3 bars. Overall, coverage is
> good, but there are some weak spots. What I consider "poor" is areas
> where the phone says "extended area" or "roam", and I am paying 4 times
> the regular rate. But these areas are well defined on the Beyond
> Wireless coverage map.
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.