Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)
In article <20040525065213.0370eab8.henryk.nospamplease@ploetzli.ch>,
Henryk Plötz <henryk.nospamplease@ploetzli.ch> wrote:
> Probably no. Current webcams tend to have problems with USB's bandwidth
> (up to 12 MBit/s) and thus need compression. Bluetooth supports only up
> to 723 kBit/s (per piconet).
Is Bluetooth as fast as it will ever be, then? Is there no reason to
except a Bluetooth 2 or such?
--
Steven Fisher; sdfisher@spamcop.net
"Morituri Nolumus Mori."
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)
Steven Fisher - typed:
> In article <20040525065213.0370eab8.henryk.nospamplease@ploetzli.ch>,
> Henryk Plötz <henryk.nospamplease@ploetzli.ch> wrote:
>
>> Probably no. Current webcams tend to have problems with USB's
>> bandwidth (up to 12 MBit/s) and thus need compression. Bluetooth
>> supports only up to 723 kBit/s (per piconet).
>
> Is Bluetooth as fast as it will ever be, then? Is there no reason to
> except a Bluetooth 2 or such?
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)
~ Q ~ wrote:
> On its way - with faster initialisation - thank God.
> http://www.bluetooth.org/spec/ > Look under Bluetooth 1.2. Someone else may know of more accessible info
> on the actual differences. I don't think b/w will increase but channel
> bonding may do it at some point in the future.
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)
pzboyz - typed:
> ~ Q ~ wrote:
>
>> On its way - with faster initialisation - thank God.
>> http://www.bluetooth.org/spec/ >> Look under Bluetooth 1.2. Someone else may know of more accessible
>> info on the actual differences. I don't think b/w will increase but
>> channel bonding may do it at some point in the future.
>
> Bluetooth 1.2 does not give greater bandwidth.
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)
1.2 enhancements are:
ESCO for better speach quality
Quicker connect - should be twice as fast
Adqaptive frequency Hopping
and Some flow control stuff in L2CAP
Cheers,
Halam Rose
BQB
7 layers UK
"~ Q ~" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2ktk1bF698h8U1@uni-berlin.de...
> pzboyz - typed:
> > ~ Q ~ wrote:
> >
> >> On its way - with faster initialisation - thank God.
> >> http://www.bluetooth.org/spec/ > >> Look under Bluetooth 1.2. Someone else may know of more accessible
> >> info on the actual differences. I don't think b/w will increase but
> >> channel bonding may do it at some point in the future.
> >
> > Bluetooth 1.2 does not give greater bandwidth.
>
> But it will soon:
> http://www.csr.com/enews/hw013.html > http://www.reed-electronics.com/ed [...] ryid=22043 >
> --
> The map is not the territory
>
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.