Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to see
added to a camera. One thing I would love to see is some kind of level
in the view finder so I could a straight horizon (without having to use
PS). Has any camera ever had this? Is there a secret to getting straight
horizons? Is it the way I hold the camera or use my left eye (as opposed
to the right) in the view finder?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 15:15:10 -0500, jbert <james.bertilson@yale.edu>
wrote:
>I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to see
> added to a camera. One thing I would love to see is some kind of level
>in the view finder so I could a straight horizon (without having to use
>PS). Has any camera ever had this? Is there a secret to getting straight
>horizons? Is it the way I hold the camera or use my left eye (as opposed
>to the right) in the view finder?
The D70, D100 and others have a 'grid mode' that overlays in the
viewfinder to assist this type of shot. It is *not* however, any type
of spirit-level.
I think (but may have imagined them) I've seen a cubic spirit level
that fits on the hot-shoe - good for tripod shots I suppose,
questionable at best.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Casio QV3000EX had a rule of thirds grid overlay which helped a bit to keep
things straight.
"jbert" <james.bertilson@yale.edu> wrote in message
news2k91n$e3u$1@news.wss.yale.edu...
>I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to see
>added to a camera. One thing I would love to see is some kind of level in
>the view finder so I could a straight horizon (without having to use PS).
>Has any camera ever had this? Is there a secret to getting straight
>horizons? Is it the way I hold the camera or use my left eye (as opposed to
>the right) in the view finder?
>
> JAB
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
There is a very simple rule to ensure horizontal horizons, and vertical
uprights etc. But regrettably it involves switching on the Camera Operators
Brain.
It can have the additional benefit of removing surplus objects from the
picture, and can sometimes help to create a really stunning masterpiece.
Roy G
"jbert" <james.bertilson@yale.edu> wrote in message
news2k91n$e3u$1@news.wss.yale.edu...
>I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to see
>added to a camera. One thing I would love to see is some kind of level in
>the view finder so I could a straight horizon (without having to use PS).
>Has any camera ever had this? Is there a secret to getting straight
>horizons? Is it the way I hold the camera or use my left eye (as opposed to
>the right) in the view finder?
>
> JAB
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
jbert wrote:
> I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to
see
> added to a camera. One thing I would love to see is some kind of
level
> in the view finder so I could a straight horizon (without having to
use
> PS). Has any camera ever had this? Is there a secret to getting
straight
> horizons? Is it the way I hold the camera or use my left eye (as
opposed
> to the right) in the view finder?
>
> JAB
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 23:17:54 GMT, in rec.photo.digital , "Roy"
<royphoty@iona-guesthouse.co.uk> in
<CEk3e.1167$JO6.1157@newsfe6-win.ntli.net> wrote:
>There is a very simple rule to ensure horizontal horizons, and vertical
>uprights etc. But regrettably it involves switching on the Camera Operators
>Brain.
>
>It can have the additional benefit of removing surplus objects from the
>picture, and can sometimes help to create a really stunning masterpiece.
>
Actually, what I would like is an external level, not one in the
viewfinder/screen. If I am looking directly, it is my job to determine
horizon. But since digital photos are free I do lots of pictures with
the camera someplace such that I can't see the screen or viewfinder
(above my head, at arms length, etc.) having a visible level, or
better yet a lighted level I could turn on and off, would help with
many of those photos.
--
Matt Silberstein
All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Matt Silberstein wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 23:17:54 GMT, in rec.photo.digital , "Roy"
> <royphoty@iona-guesthouse.co.uk> in
> <CEk3e.1167$JO6.1157@newsfe6-win.ntli.net> wrote:
>
>> There is a very simple rule to ensure horizontal horizons, and
>> vertical uprights etc. But regrettably it involves switching on the
>> Camera Operators Brain.
>>
>> It can have the additional benefit of removing surplus objects from
>> the picture, and can sometimes help to create a really stunning
>> masterpiece.
>>
> Actually, what I would like is an external level, not one in the
> viewfinder/screen. If I am looking directly, it is my job to determine
> horizon. But since digital photos are free I do lots of pictures with
> the camera someplace such that I can't see the screen or viewfinder
> (above my head, at arms length, etc.) having a visible level, or
> better yet a lighted level I could turn on and off, would help with
> many of those photos.
I have a battery-operated hand drill that flashes a red light when a
horizontal hole would not be horizontal. If they can put that in a
$35.00 tool, a sophisticated conjugation of some such should be easy in
a thousand-dollar camera ...
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
jbert wrote:
> I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to
> see added to a camera. One thing I would love to see is some kind of
> level in the view finder so I could a straight horizon (without
> having to use PS). Has any camera ever had this?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:05:40 -0500, in rec.photo.digital ,
clutch@lycos.com in <114u5r3nuonl300@news.supernews.com> wrote:
>jbert <james.bertilson@yale.edu> wrote:
>
>>I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to see
>> added to a camera.
>
>
>I'd like gps and a voice memo mode.
If you are going to do a GPS, then add a compass/level. Let me know
later where I was standing and what angle I held the computer. If it
could say how high above sea level that would be great, but not
actually possible to be usefully accurate. (Height above ground, yes,
if there is a clear view.)
--
Matt Silberstein
All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:05:40 -0500, in rec.photo.digital ,
> clutch@lycos.com in <114u5r3nuonl300@news.supernews.com> wrote:
> >jbert <james.bertilson@yale.edu> wrote:
> >
> >>I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to see
> >>added to a camera.
> >
> >I'd like gps and a voice memo mode.
>
> If you are going to do a GPS, then add a compass/level. Let me know later
> where I was standing and what angle I held the computer. If it could say
> how high above sea level that would be great, but not actually possible to
> be usefully accurate. (Height above ground, yes, if there is a clear
> view.)
Hmm. Photos with EXIF GPS data about location and shooting direction
could be assembled into the mother of all VR panoramas. Search the web
for EXIF containing the data you need, and you could probably make an
immersive VR of a populated place like, say, San Fransisco without ever
touching a camera. It might have a few gaps here and there, but that
would make it interesting.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
usenet@mile23.c0m (Paul Mitchum) writes:
> Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:05:40 -0500, in rec.photo.digital ,
> > clutch@lycos.com in <114u5r3nuonl300@news.supernews.com> wrote:
> > >jbert <james.bertilson@yale.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > >>I just finished reading several post about what people would wish to see
> > >>added to a camera.
> > >
> > >I'd like gps and a voice memo mode.
> >
> > If you are going to do a GPS, then add a compass/level. Let me know later
> > where I was standing and what angle I held the computer. If it could say
> > how high above sea level that would be great, but not actually possible to
> > be usefully accurate. (Height above ground, yes, if there is a clear
> > view.)
>
> Hmm. Photos with EXIF GPS data about location and shooting direction
> could be assembled into the mother of all VR panoramas. Search the web
> for EXIF containing the data you need, and you could probably make an
> immersive VR of a populated place like, say, San Fransisco without ever
> touching a camera. It might have a few gaps here and there, but that
> would make it interesting.
Some cameras have a port that can connect to a GPS, such as a Nikon D1x. The
California Coastline project uses this to keep track of exactly where they are
filming: http://www.californiacoastline.org/
But you don't need the camera to record the GPS information, you can use
software that integrates the coordinates from the save points in your GPR, buy
matching up the time fields with the EXIF information. Oziphototool is one
such application: http://oziphototool.alistairdickie.com/
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Michael Meissner <mrmnews@the-meissners.org> wrote:
>But you don't need the camera to record the GPS information, you can use
>software that integrates the coordinates from the save points in your GPR, buy
>matching up the time fields with the EXIF information. Oziphototool is one
>such application: http://oziphototool.alistairdickie.com/
Thanks for that useful response. I have a feeling I will be replacing
my aging Magellen Trailblazer (circa 1995) soon.
Wes
--
Reply to:
Whiskey Echo Sierra Sierra AT Gee Tee EYE EYE dot COM
Lycos address is a spam trap.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.