FS-X and a choice between AMD and Intel

[bgaviator1]

Hello....I have a tough choice to make....I want to build a new computer since mine is currently just a single core 2.6 gig system. I am sure any quad core or better is going to be leaps and bounds better than what I'm used to. I am not a big gamer, and don't plan to be......but I do enjoy Microsoft Flight Simulator.....I want to try and run it with as max setting as possible. I currently have a Radeon 4890 that I bought awhile back that's still sitting in its box. I had anticipated building my system a long time ago, and at the time that was one of the top GPUs.
Now I am ready to finally finish this thing, and I was set on getting a Phenom II either 980 BE or 1100T x6. I have always worked with AMD, so that's what I am familiar with. However, I see on web sites like Passmark.com that the Intel 2600k just seems to blow the AMDs away....although they processor and other components cost more than I really wanted to spend.
My ultimate question is, would I still be able to run FS-X awesomely if I stick with AMD and my 4890, or should I really just try and splurge for a Intel 2600k? Even if I go with Intel, will my 4890 graphics card hold me back? Please advise. Thanks.

 

[Motopsychojdn]

The 4890 is not really all that anymore I'm afraid, whichever option you take its going to be a serious bottleneck,
if flightsim uses hyperthreading then the 2600k would be great, but if it doesn't then the cheaper 2500k will suffice,
although a quick goolge gave http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElgIN2rG5GQ so maybe you can,
I would recommend an ati69xx series card or nvidia 570 upwards to get the best results, although it is of course subject to your budget
Moto

 

[amuffin]

Well what is your total budget? I am assuming around 300-500, your 4890 will be holding you back, a modern day card will outperform it. A good option would be an i5-2500k, asrock z68 extreme 3 gen 3, and a 100-200 dollar gap for a graphics card.