Worth upgrading GPU?

scorchedskulls41

Distinguished
Aug 1, 2011
22
0
18,520
I want to know your opinion if it is worth upgrading my GPU. I currently have a GTX 280 and was thinking about getting a newer card, probobly a GTX 560 ti. I mostly motivated by haveing DirectX 11 support and better performance. My current card has no problem keeping up with what I am playing but I am not sure if I should upgrade now or just hold off for longer.
 

rockyjohn

Distinguished
The THG hiearchy charts show the relative ranks of both the GTX 280 and 560 Ti.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-graphics-card,2964-7.html

You might also find the rest of the article helpful as it shows recommended video cards for different budget levels with convenient links to reviews of the cards.

I think you should also consider the GTX 560 - without the Ti as it has almost as good of performance as the Ti but at lower cost. Here is a good review on the card that shows the differences:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-560-amp-edition-gtx-560-directcu-ii-top,2944.html

For additional information about upgrading graphics cards, I recommend this site:

http://www.upgradevideocards.com/
 


Without knowing what cpu you have, nobody can answer such a question, they can only guess that it will be worth it.
 

scorchedskulls41

Distinguished
Aug 1, 2011
22
0
18,520
Well here is my build:
Intel Core i7-920 2.66GHz
EVGA X58 3-Way SLI
CORSAIR XMS3 6GB DDR3 1600
EVGA GeForce GTX 280 Superclocked 1GB
PC Power and Cooling Silencer 910W
4x Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB
Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium

And I use a 37" LCD HDTV at 1920x1080
 

rockyjohn

Distinguished
Yes you can, with this GT 560

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130661

It costs a little more ($175 vs $168 with shipping included) but for that $7 more you get a superclocked GT 560 and the advantage of the nVidia CUDA and PhysX features.

This review shows the two butting heads pretty much evenly with stock speeds:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-560-amp-edition-gtx-560-directcu-ii-top,2944.html

So the factory overclocked GTX 560 wins easily. But the real advantage is having the CUDA feature which I believe more developers will start using to speed up other apps, and PhysX for gaming.
 

rockyjohn

Distinguished


The GTX 560 uses the same GF114 ASIC chip as the GTX 560 Ti, it just has one less streaming multiprocessor enabled., which as the benchmarks show, has only a small effect on gaming performance.
 

scorchedskulls41

Distinguished
Aug 1, 2011
22
0
18,520
I personally stick to Nvidia every build I have ever done was with Nvidia cards and with OCing and SLI I have never had problems.

I was personally looking at getting one of the 560 ti's now that they have rebates:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130651]

I am always unsure when buying new cards since performance is always so close with them that it is not easy to know when spending a few extra $ on the next step up is worth it.
 

wiyosaya

Distinguished
Apr 12, 2006
915
1
18,990

IMHO, spend the few extra $$ especially if it is for a next generation chip.
 

rockyjohn

Distinguished


Tis a conumdrum. And basically a choice of personal preference, is the extra speed worth the incremental cost.

And in this case - the GTX 560 Ti vs. no Ti - it is not a question of a new chip - they both have the same ones.

LOL - and the "definitely worth it" comment comes from one who lists his graphics card as the GT 240.
 




It has 48 less SP's, and the benchmarks show a pretty big difference in gaming performance. I think your reading the heavily overclocked GTX560 vs. GTX560ti (stock) benchmarks, which can't be compared because the ti can be overclocked too.

The 560ti competes with the HD6950 1gb, the GTX560 competes with the 6870.




 

rockyjohn

Distinguished


In the THG review I linked above, THG had the "clock speed set to reference specification for reference benchmarks" for both the 560 and 560 Ti, as stated on the test setup page:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-560-amp-edition-gtx-560-directcu-ii-top,2944-4.html

The benchmarks show little difference in gaming performance - I refer you again to the THG review I linked above and as noted below with the non-Ti listed first:

Crysis 2 - 63.2 FPS vs. 66.9
Bulletstorm - 55.4 vs. 53.9 (non Ti actually wins this one)
Metro - 67.3 vs. 74.7
Loar Planet 2 - 64.3 vs. 70.6
Aliens v. Predator - 64.9 vs. 72.8
F1 2010 - 50.9 vs. 54.8
Just Cause 2 - 59.6 vs. 65.9
HAWX 2 - 115.0 vs. 124.0

Those are not big differences in gaming performance. And for both cards the minimums were pretty close to the averages. So most likely the differences will not even be noticeable while playing a game. So you would pay about 23% more for a 10% increase that will most often not even be noticeable. But as I noted above, it is a matter of personal preference if it is worth it to you.