A4-3400 Llano 2.7GHz 65W vs. Athlon II X3 455 Rana 3.3GHz 95W?

Tags:

Last response: January 4, 2012 1:17 AM in CPUs

raven1970

January 3, 2012 6:08:58 PM

Considering two different routes on budget system. It is all coming down to CPU/Mobo at this point and trying to understand which would give more bang for the buck? Cost is very close to not be a factor. Thanks in advance.

AMD A4-3400 Llano 2.7GHz Socket FM1 65W Dual-Core Desktop APU with DirectX 11 Graphic AMD Radeon HD 6410D AD3400OJGXBOX (Model:AD3400OJGXBOX)
BIOSTAR A55MH FM1 AMD A55 (Hudson D2) HDMI Micro ATX AMD Motherboard (Model:A55MH)
16GB RAM max

vs.

AMD Athlon II X3 455 Rana 3.3GHz Socket AM3 95W Triple-Core Desktop Processor ADX455WFGMBOX
BIOSTAR A880G+ AM3 AMD 880G HDMI Micro ATX AMD Motherboard
(integrated ATI Radeon HD 4250)
8GB RAM max

Again, budget system with very little intent to upgrade. Possibly upgrade graphics and RAM at some point. Both systems will be starting with 4GB RAM.

More about : 3400 llano 7ghz 65w athlon 455 rana 3ghz 95w

| E-mail me updates
| Report abuse

truegenius

CPUs Authority

January 3, 2012 7:08:52 PM

1st sys for graphics

2nd sys for cpu
2nd is my choice (as you will add a graphics card latter)

| Report abuse

jaguarskx

CPUs Master

January 4, 2012 1:17:10 AM

If you want to play games without installing a video card, then Llano would be the better choice.

If you are doing CPU intensive tasks, then the Athlon II would be a little better.

| Report abuse

Ask the community

Related ressources:

Read discussions in other CPUs categories