Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Solved

Witcher 2 and the Radeon 6970 (or other GPU)

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
August 10, 2011 2:30:22 AM

Hey is my GPU bad or what? With Ubersampling turned on (and all other settings on ultra) I can run the Witcher 2 in the 19-45 frame per second range. What is your experience with Ubersampling?

For those curious about my rig....

CPU: Intel Core i7 2600 (not K, don't plan on overclocking)
Mother Board: MSI P67A-G43 (B3)
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD 6970
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB
PSU: Corsair CMPSU-750TX (750 watts)
HDD: Western Digital Caviar Black WD5002AALX (7200RPM 500GB)
Disk Drive: LITE-ON Black 4X Blu-Ray Reader
Case: COOLER MASTER HAF X RC-942-KKN1

Best solution

August 11, 2011 3:13:32 PM

those are pretty good numbers. but in what resolution are you playing?

I get like 17-35 FPS with ultra settings @ 1920x1080 and this is my rig

CPU: Intel i5 Sandy Bridge 2500k @ 3.3GHz <--- Not OC'ed
GPU: MSI Twin Frozr II HD6950 2GB @ 800/1250 MHz <--- Not OC'ed nor Modded to 6970
RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz <--- OC'ed from 1333Mhz
MOBO: MSI p67-G43 LGA1155
PSU: Corsair TX650 V2 @ 650W
HD: Hitachi 320GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s <----Worst part imo+



P.d. Posting your case wont give you more fps xD...jk :p ..nor the disk drive xD...well psu is needed to know if your getting enough "gasoline" for your hungry rig
Share
Related resources
a b U Graphics card
August 11, 2011 3:28:28 PM

The whole scene is rendered multiple times to give best possible texture and object details and antialiasing (better than antialias and anisotropy even on highest settings).”
= Ubrsampling.
without it on, you wont see a difference except for the FPS drops. You should be able to run it on ultra no prob just disable uber sampling.
m
0
l
August 11, 2011 4:13:06 PM

Uber Sampling is not easy to run with a crossfire or SLI setup (6990/590), playing with a GTX 580 I can maintain 22fps+, however this isn't really playable with the combat in TW2, so I suggest you just disable ubersampling.
m
0
l
August 18, 2011 3:32:48 AM

panacuba said:
those are pretty good numbers. but in what resolution are you playing?

I get like 17-35 FPS with ultra settings @ 1920x1080 and this is my rig

CPU: Intel i5 Sandy Bridge 2500k @ 3.3GHz <--- Not OC'ed
GPU: MSI Twin Frozr II HD6950 2GB @ 800/1250 MHz <--- Not OC'ed nor Modded to 6970
RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz <--- OC'ed from 1333Mhz
MOBO: MSI p67-G43 LGA1155
PSU: Corsair TX650 V2 @ 650W
HD: Hitachi 320GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s <----Worst part imo+



P.d. Posting your case wont give you more fps xD...jk :p ..nor the disk drive xD...well psu is needed to know if your getting enough "gasoline" for your hungry rig


Well sadly my monitor is running at a 1366x 768 resolution, but it does accept 1080p signals. (HDMI doesn't look good for some reason) I tested the FPS in 1080p I believe. (Not 100% on that though)
m
0
l
August 18, 2011 3:34:20 AM

Best answer selected by Reginthorn.
m
0
l
September 12, 2011 4:10:32 PM

sorry to bump this. But some video cards work better at higher resolution. U should try rise it up to see if u get a lil fps boost
m
0
l
!