Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > Panasonic FZ5 Noise Report

Panasonic FZ5 Noise Report

Forum Digital Camera : Digital Camera General - Panasonic FZ5 Noise Report

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

This is part of what www.digitalcamerainfo.com actually said that
alarmed me. If you need smaller aperture and a hand holdable shutter
speed you have little choice than to shoot at ISO400. And look at what
they say:

"the resulting images are fraught with noise and rendered virtually
unusable"

I certainly want to know why they said this.

The 3.52 score still indicates the camera’s difficulty handling noise,
even when the user sets the sensitivity rating. The issue stems from the
limited sensitivity ratings offered: 80, 100, 200, and 400. While the
ISO 80 setting is a fortunate inclusion to ensure that crisp images are
recorded with utter clarity in abundant lighting (beyond the ISO 100’s
capabilities), the ISO 200 and 400 settings are completely ineffective.
As is evident in the chart above, the FZ5 will provide images with
adequate clarity and definition when the ISO 80 or 100 settings are
used; however, once it is pushed to ISO 200 or ISO 400, the resulting
images are fraught with noise and rendered virtually unusable.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

 

measekite wrote:
> This is part of what www.digitalcamerainfo.com actually said that
> alarmed me. If you need smaller aperture and a hand holdable shutter
> speed you have little choice than to shoot at ISO400. And look at what
> they say:
>
> "the resulting images are fraught with noise and rendered virtually
> unusable"
>
> I certainly want to know why they said this.

I've just been reviewing some FZ20 pictures, and under my viewing
conditions (a 1280 pixel wide monitor, approximateing a 6 x 4 inch print),
noise from the ISO 200 images was only just noticeable.

I would not recommend ISO 400 except under exceptional conditions and,
even then, I would expect to have to apply noise reduction. If you were
photographing something where smooth skin tones were required, for
example, the ISO 400 noise could be unacceptable (as it would be from
almost any point-and-shoot camera), but if you were photographing a
one-off event, any images might be considered usable.

Cheers,
David

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital Camera General > Panasonic FZ5 Noise Report
Go to:

There are 1179 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them