Bluetooth Qualification

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:26:54 -0700, Michael J. Edelmann wrote:

> Hello
>
> Hopefully there is someone who can explain the following: If I want to
> sell a bluetooth functionality (ie software who uses a bluetooth
> stick) is it a must to make a bluetooth qualification with SIG to sell
> the bluetooth software? Or can I sell it without qualification? Or:
> What have I to do that I don't have to qualify? Is the qualification
> just to get the BT-logo?

If it's just software you're developing, then AFAIK you don't need to be a
member of the Bluetooth SIG.

--
Michael Turner

Email (ROT13)

zvxr.gheare1963@grfpb.arg

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)

michael turner <zvxr.gheare1963@grfpb.arg> wrote in message
> If it's just software you're developing, then AFAIK you don't need to be a
> member of the Bluetooth SIG.

This is not correct.

If you are creating a product, then that product needs to be BQB
approved. They will test the 'profile' being used by that product. If
the product is almost entirely reusing something that is already BQB
approved, the amount of testing should be low.

pzboyz

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:46:36 -0700, pzboyz wrote:

> michael turner <zvxr.gheare1963@grfpb.arg> wrote in message
>> If it's just software you're developing, then AFAIK you don't need to be a
>> member of the Bluetooth SIG.
>
> This is not correct.
>
> If you are creating a product, then that product needs to be BQB
> approved. They will test the 'profile' being used by that product. If
> the product is almost entirely reusing something that is already BQB
> approved, the amount of testing should be low.

What about this then ?
http://www.bluez.org/
'Official Linux Bluetooth protocol stack'

This is just software, and there appears to be no BQB approvals, and SIG
memberships here.

--
Michael Turner

Email (ROT13)

zvxr.gheare1963@grfpb.arg

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)

> This is not correct.
>
> If you are creating a product, then that product needs to be BQB
> approved. They will test the 'profile' being used by that product. If
> the product is almost entirely reusing something that is already BQB
> approved, the amount of testing should be low.
>

Any comments on the claims made by Free2Move (www.free2move.se), then ?
They sell an OEM module with antenna, stack-on-board and an on-board
application layer implementing what they have named a 'wireless uart'. They
claim that *no* additional BT qualification is needed.

The thing works fine, btw - had a 'birds-nest' prototype running in a day or
so. Darn, these things are hard to hand-solder... (and no, I have no
affiliation whatsoever with said company...)

regards
Per Laursen

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)

"Per Laursen" <per.laursen@maNOSPAMil.dk> wrote in message news:<417aa6a2$0$287$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk>...

> Any comments on the claims made by Free2Move (www.free2move.se), then ?
> They sell an OEM module with antenna, stack-on-board and an on-board
> application layer implementing what they have named a 'wireless uart'. They
> claim that *no* additional BT qualification is needed.

They have had the *full* system BQB approved. See this link ...
http://qualweb.bluetooth.org/Template2.cfm?LinkQualifie...

When selling said item as a part of whatever end product you are
selling, you will need to include references to this BQB approval in
your documentation.

pzboyz

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.bluetooth (More info?)

Ok - thanks!
regards
Per

"pzboyz" <pzboyz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c03869cb.0410260200.6c391446@posting.google.com...
> "Per Laursen" <per.laursen@maNOSPAMil.dk> wrote in message
news:<417aa6a2$0$287$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk>...
>
> > Any comments on the claims made by Free2Move (www.free2move.se), then ?
> > They sell an OEM module with antenna, stack-on-board and an on-board
> > application layer implementing what they have named a 'wireless uart'.
They
> > claim that *no* additional BT qualification is needed.
>
> They have had the *full* system BQB approved. See this link ...
>
http://qualweb.bluetooth.org/Template2.cfm?LinkQualifie...
>
> When selling said item as a part of whatever end product you are
> selling, you will need to include references to this BQB approval in
> your documentation.
>
> pzboyz