Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > 1090T bottlenecking a 7970?

1090T bottlenecking a 7970?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs 1090T bottlenecking a 7970?

Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

I bought a 7970 a few days ago to replace my 6870, as Skyrim was running horribly in my system, and I figured it was time for an upgrade. Problem is, Skyrim still runs horribly. In cities it slows down to 20fps. My GPU is barely working at all, and my 1090T stays at around 30% use in these outside areas. I can't figure out what the problem is. I don't think it should be bottlenecking the system, as the CPU is fast. Shogun 2 runs very nicely with no bottleneck. Can someone explain this? Should I return the card and pick up a 2600k, and revert to my 6870? I'm at a loss here.

Register or log in to remove.

Is the 1090T at stock clocks?

------------------------------ UK.
Current PC Build :
Phenom II X2 555 @ 4.2Ghz | XFX HD 6870 Black Editon 1GB GDDR5 | Asus M5A78L-M LX |Hypertec 133MhzMhz DDR3 4Gb [2x2GB] Dual Channel | Cooler Master Hyper TX3 | XFX 450W Core Editon 80plus Bronze | Thermaltake VX Black Edition
Reply to Yummerzzz

It is overclocked to 4.0 GHz. Like I said, Skyrim is the only game that seems to be having problems. Though to be honesty, I had to reinstall Windows so I've only really tested Skyrim and Shogun.

Reply to RoflCopter4

HD 7970: Bulldozer vs. Sandy Bridge vs. Nehalem
CPUs tested:
Bulldozer - Flagship AMD FX-8150
Sandy-bridge - i5-2500k
Nehalem - i7-920

I know that they didn't test your CPU in this review. But it's a nice idea to check how much you would gain using these CPUs with a HD7970.
Example, Skyrim, in 1920x1200, max details, 4x AA, a sandy-bridge deliver aprox. 50% more fps than bulldozer and aprox. 30% more fps than nehalem. (your cpu should be between bulldozer and nehalem, close to nehalem)

------------------------------ Core i7 2600k, Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, 16GB Patriot DDR3, 2TB HD , SLI GTX 460 1GB, XFX 750W BE, 3D Vision, CM 690 II Advanced
Reply to vitornob

Six 1090T cores at 4GHz with an HD7970 wins, easy.

Reply to Wisecracker

Wisecracker wrote :

Six 1090T cores at 4GHz with an HD7970 wins, easy.



wrong


most games cant use more than 4 cores


in other words 2 of the cores will be idle


cpu's with more than 4 cores are not designed for gamers and are designed for rendering/workstations


for example if all you do is game, a quad core is all you will need

if you do a lot of video encoding/transcoding, rendering .etc then it would be worth getting a cpu with more cores

Reply to shanky887614

RoflCopter4 wrote :

...

Should I return the card and pick up a 2600k, and revert to my 6870? I'm at a loss here.


Reply to Wisecracker

RoflCopter4 wrote :

I bought a 7970 a few days ago to replace my 6870, as Skyrim was running horribly in my system, and I figured it was time for an upgrade. Problem is, Skyrim still runs horribly. In cities it slows down to 20fps. My GPU is barely working at all, and my 1090T stays at around 30% use in these outside areas. I can't figure out what the problem is. I don't think it should be bottlenecking the system, as the CPU is fast. Shogun 2 runs very nicely with no bottleneck. Can someone explain this? Should I return the card and pick up a 2600k, and revert to my 6870? I'm at a loss here.





Don't do that, The 1090 is enough for a 7970 its about equal to a 920. Skyrim is kinda a Skippy game from time to time. But if you want to later upgrade to ivy.

Reply to jdwii

I've decided to keep the card and my CPU for now. It does seem to run most games without issue. Can anyone explain why I'm having such problems with Skyrim? It runs horribly for no apparent reason.

Reply to RoflCopter4

driver issues or you got a bad 7970 maybe? Your 1090t isn't bottlenecking, try google and see if others are having the same problem.

------------------------------ Bigfoot came into the world to save sinners..
Reply to bawchicawawa

Skyrim is a badly optimized game that is VERY dependent on your CPU. An overclocked 2500k with a decent video card (let's say a 6770) has no problem playing Skyrim. In GPU dependent games like BF3 you should have really smooth gameplay.

Reply to diec4st

RoflCopter4 wrote :

I've decided to keep the card and my CPU for now. It does seem to run most games without issue. Can anyone explain why I'm having such problems with Skyrim? It runs horribly for no apparent reason.

  


I play skyrim maxed out with my 1100t OC 3.9ghz and a 6950. And it feels smooth it skips at times(mainly in the city) but its pretty smooth and looks great.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by jdwii on 01-15-2012 at 11:56:22 PM
Reply to jdwii

as the guy above me said you need a sandy bridge cpu to play skyrim at its best settings. you dont have a sandy bridge so your experience isnt as good as it could be.

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

jdwii wrote :

I play skyrim maxed out with my 1100t OC 3.9ghz and a 6950. And it feels smooth it skips at times(mainly in the city) but its pretty smooth and looks great.


How on earth are you doing this? Mine will not run smoothly on any settings.

Reply to RoflCopter4

RoflCopter4 wrote :

How on earth are you doing this? Mine will not run smoothly on any settings.




Their has to be something wrong with your game,drivers. Are you running it on the latest drivers? And what fps are you getting while playing? I can say regardless to what others are saying here the 1090t is fine for skyrim


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYF-xHPN0Tw


Not my video but still proof.

Reply to jdwii

But i can say the 1090t is limiting your performance and if you had a 2500K you would not be getting those low FPS(20's). but a 1090t is still good enough for the game. Also the game is glitchy.


Message edited by jdwii on 01-16-2012 at 12:35:52 AM
Reply to jdwii

I get 60 inside and in caves, 40 outside, and 20 in cities. It's awful. I just ran Battlefield 2 as well, and I was only getting 45. The GPU was only running at about 50%. There has to be a bottleneck.

Reply to RoflCopter4

Its a problem with skyrim, also what is your power supply?

------------------------------ Overclocked Intel HD 3000 Performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] e#t1978730
Thermal Paste Removal/Installation Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] emoval-ins
Reply to amuffin

i have a 7970 on a i7 950 and it runs smooth as can be in all situations.
i turned down AA to 2x but turned on fxaa and AF is at 8x. it looks the same to me but runs smoother.
to pick up some extra frames install this
http://www.skyrimnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=4387

Reply to farrengottu

My PSU is 700W. Can anyone explain the Battlefield 2 thing?

Reply to RoflCopter4

Which 700w psu

------------------------------ Overclocked Intel HD 3000 Performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] e#t1978730
Thermal Paste Removal/Installation Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] emoval-ins
Reply to amuffin

RoflCopter4 wrote :

How on earth are you doing this? Mine will not run smoothly on any settings.



hes not. simply as that. well he might for his definition of maxed out but generally maxing out a game is running at 1080p with everything turned up at 60fps. hes not getting those fps with that cpu. i have the same gpu and a total average in caves outdoors and cities i might be getting 60 fps only because im not in the cities much.

its been proven that there is cpu gains up to a 4.0 ghz sandy bridge in skyrim. it only uses two cores as well.

jdwii wrote :

Their has to be something wrong with your game,drivers. Are you running it on the latest drivers? And what fps are you getting while playing? I can say regardless to what others are saying here the 1090t is fine for skyrim


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYF-xHPN0Tw


Not my video but still proof.



whats wrong is that his cpu is too slow.

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

I cant believe all these people know so little. Im in the same shoes, with a 1055t. Have to OC it to 3.5 to get good frames on skyrim and BF3. It massively bottlenecks my 5850 crossfire so I know its bottlenecking you. My city frames are not as bad as yours though. Make sure you patch skyrim there is a new patch that makes it far smoother.

Your going to have to OC much harder lol, and than replace it in the near future. Also I always wandered if you underclock your cards so the bottleneck with the cpu becomes less and perhaps stabilizes the FPS. Just something I have been wandering.

PS 1055t = 3.4GHZ = 42 FPS/ 3.5GHZ = 50 FPS outside
Yeah the bottleneck is that big.

Reply to chaosgs

No mention of RAM or OS?

I tripled my RAM recently and got huge performance gains. 4GB->12GB. Some newer games are just incredibly RAM inefficient.

Reply to Cazalan

^^ Who would buy a 7970 and only have 4 GB of ram?

Reply to chaosgs

Cazalan wrote :

No mention of RAM or OS?

I tripled my RAM recently and got huge performance gains. 4GB->12GB. Some newer games are just incredibly RAM inefficient.



skyrim is a 32bit program therefor it will benefit very little from more then 4 gb of ram. i have never even seen a game use more then 2.5 gb of ram.

oh btw most games are only 32 bit programed.

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

What CPU-NB OC if any are you guys running? I can say for a fact, with my 1100T setup, the difference between 2000 and 2600 concerning 3d performance was quite impressive to say the least. I leave my HT at 2000 / stock clock.

Reply to garage1217

RoflCopter4 wrote :

It is overclocked to 4.0 GHz. Like I said, Skyrim is the only game that seems to be having problems. Though to be honesty, I had to reinstall Windows so I've only really tested Skyrim and Shogun.




...looks like you might not have been running optimally with your 6870 and it's misled you as to the problem you are experiencing. Here is an users opinion from the AMD forums....

" 11.11a are running very well for me in Skyrim & many other games, I have yet to notice any negative effects, Overall a lot better than the 11.11 official drivers.

For me that is."

...now those drivers are specific to the 6800/6900 GPU series, it may be that you'll have to wait for optimization from AMD for the 7970 card. meanwhile I'd update your Windows properly and make sure you have the latest drivers installed for all your hardware, including downloaded the latest video driver for the above video card.

Reply to harna

im playing skyrim with a single 5850 and my 1090t stock and i dont get any slow downs

------------------------------ Nobody knows what's gonna happen at the end of the line, so you might aswell enjoy the trip
Reply to megagabobe1

cbrunnem wrote :

skyrim is a 32bit program therefor it will benefit very little from more then 4 gb of ram. i have never even seen a game use more then 2.5 gb of ram.

oh btw most games are only 32 bit programed.



Partially true. While applications compiled as 32-bit are limited to just 2GB of Address Space usage under Win32, under Win64, that upper limit is extended to 4GB if compiled as Large Address Aware [though most apps fail to reach this amount].

Farther, Windows now pre-caches a lot of data in RAM, so there is a slight upgrade in performance from 4GB to about 8GB of RAM or so [less paging]. You get serverly diminishing returns at about 6GB or so though...

But yes, when you look at most gaming benchmarks, even the PII series trails Sandy Bridge processors. You are, frankly, bottlenecked with that processor in applications that do not scale to use at least four cores. IPC matters more then core count in games.

Reply to gamerk316

megagabobe1 wrote :

im playing skyrim with a single 5850 and my 1090t stock and i dont get any slow downs



you do you just dont know it.

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

I got rid of slow downs by underclocking my 5850 crossfire from 700+ to 400-500MHZ. Need to test that out more.

Reply to chaosgs

I'm having a similair issue, I use a QX6800 OCed to 3.27 GHZ with a 7970, and I'm not getting the frames I should, most everything RUNS, but I see weird spiking issues in some games. Like I get 45 fps maxxed in deus ex hr, when that card is capable of way more. Do you think my old processor is causing that problem? I also have an old motherboard with an nvidia chipset which I think may also be causing problems. I see some weird variation though. Obviously its powerful because I can do things like play the witcher 2 at 3840X1080 (20 fps in combat, 40 fps indoors) with ubersampling on, but nothing is running solidly.

I do realize I should generally upgrade my cpu, but I'm waiting for ivybridge before I throw down any money.

i would appreciate any help on this.

Reply to PerpAnd

PerpAnd wrote :

I'm having a similair issue, I use a QX6800 OCed to 3.27 GHZ with a 7970, and I'm not getting the frames I should, most everything RUNS, but I see weird spiking issues in some games. Like I get 45 fps maxxed in deus ex hr, when that card is capable of way more. Do you think my old processor is causing that problem? I also have an old motherboard with an nvidia chipset which I think may also be causing problems. I see some weird variation though. Obviously its powerful because I can do things like play the witcher 2 at 3840X1080 (20 fps in combat, 40 fps indoors) with ubersampling on, but nothing is running solidly.

I do realize I should generally upgrade my cpu, but I'm waiting for ivybridge before I throw down any money.

i would appreciate any help on this.



there is no doubt its your cpu. its over 3 years old.

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

cbrunnem wrote :

there is no doubt its your cpu. its over 3 years old.



Well if that's the case, that's a relief, I was wondering if it was my CPU or the nvidia chipset in my motherboard. I don't really have the greatest idea about how the processors mathematically scale from generation to generation. I was a little bit hesitant to assume it was my processor, because the thing was really good when I bought it, and it is a Quadcore with a decent clock speed, although I do realize it is not as good as an i7 running at the same clock.

So I will just take it as is until ivybridge comes out, otherwise I'd be paying about 400$ for a stopgap.

Reply to PerpAnd

PerpAnd wrote :

Well if that's the case, that's a relief, I was wondering if it was my CPU or the nvidia chipset in my motherboard. I don't really have the greatest idea about how the processors mathematically scale from generation to generation. I was a little bit hesitant to assume it was my processor, because the thing was really good when I bought it, and it is a Quadcore with a decent clock speed, although I do realize it is not as good as an i7 running at the same clock.

So I will just take it as is until ivybridge comes out, otherwise I'd be paying about 400$ for a stopgap.



here something to look at. keep in mind that each graph has a more powerful card so the one to look at is the fourth graph with the gtx 295. in some games that are gpu dependent the cpu doesnt matter much but others it does.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forum [...] s-i5-2500K

so now lets compare the gtx 295 to your 7970.
we will have to do it in a round about way but it gets the message across.
here's a comparison of a 580vs 7970
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/517?vs=508
the 7970 wins by a decent amount
heres the 295 vs 580
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

the 580 s way better then the 295 and the 7970 is better then the 580 so that last graph will have an even bigger difference in it because the gpu can now run faster making the cpu run faster but in your case your cpu cant.

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

cbrunnem wrote :

here something to look at. keep in mind that each graph has a more powerful card so the one to look at is the fourth graph with the gtx 295. in some games that are gpu dependent the cpu doesnt matter much but others it does.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forum [...] s-i5-2500K

so now lets compare the gtx 295 to your 7970.
we will have to do it in a round about way but it gets the message across.
here's a comparison of a 580vs 7970
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/517?vs=508
the 7970 wins by a decent amount
heres the 295 vs 580
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

the 580 s way better then the 295 and the 7970 is better then the 580 so that last graph will have an even bigger difference in it because the gpu can now run faster making the cpu run faster but in your case your cpu cant.



Yeah, and as luck would have it, I just saw a 2500k and motherboard for $280 on craigslist, gonna snag it hopefully.

Reply to PerpAnd

you will need ddr3 ram fyi which is another 20-30 dollars these days

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

I already have 8 GB of DDR3 I picked up while it was on sale.

Reply to PerpAnd

good deal. hope it all works out

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

cbrunnem wrote :

good deal. hope it all works out


Hopefully, the guy is playing hard to get, some guy is offering a ridiculously good mobo for 40$ so I'm hoping to buy the processor from one guy and the mobo from the other, sigh, craigslist and people who don't respond within 10 minutes to any and every email. Don't people have smartphones :(

Reply to PerpAnd

whats the mobo?

------------------------------ 2600K 4.5GHZ @ 1.312v | Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3 | 8GB gskill ripjaws 1600mhz ram | noctua nh-d14 | GIGABYTE GV-R695OC Readon 6950 | muskin enhanced chronos deluxe 240gb
Reply to cbrunnem

Well that deal fell through, but I managed to get my hands on an i7-2600k for 230$, now I'm cooking with gas.


Message edited by PerpAnd on 01-22-2012 at 09:13:54 AM
Reply to PerpAnd

Right, I haven't replied to this thread in a while, but I have new info to add here. Not only is it not running very well in Skyrim, but also in Assassins Creed Revalations. The CPU maxes out around 50% (3 cores maxed out) and the GPU at 40%. It's blatantly obvious there is an overclock here. Should I pickup a 2500k? Is it worth it? Also, I've noticed some annoying coil whine and I've had random crashes (while playing Revalations) after which the computer hangs within a minute. Is this the GPU or the PSU?

Reply to RoflCopter4

RoflCopter4 wrote :

Right, I haven't replied to this thread in a while, but I have new info to add here. Not only is it not running very well in Skyrim, but also in Assassins Creed Revalations. The CPU maxes out around 50% (3 cores maxed out) and the GPU at 40%. It's blatantly obvious there is an overclock here. Should I pickup a 2500k? Is it worth it? Also, I've noticed some annoying coil whine and I've had random crashes (while playing Revalations) after which the computer hangs within a minute. Is this the GPU or the PSU?



if your cpu usage is 405 thats a massive bottleneck. you will see at least 20fps increase with an overclocked i5 2500k

Reply to cbrunnem

Thanks. I'll definitely look into that. Is it as easy to overclock as I've heard?

Also, is the high pitched coil whine a bad thing? I've heard other people have had the same issue but with no real problems with the card.

Finally, how would I know if there are problems with my PSU? After a power outage today my computer crashed a couple of times.

Reply to RoflCopter4


theres a big issue with this bench..
We used the same Windows installation on all systems and moved the HDD between test rigs.
so that hardware abstraction layer would be corrupt on at least 2 of the systems...

not so much as to show the tests as completely useless but it is flawed.
depending on which system the hdd was installed on first would vary the results some what... still they would probably make the gap between the 3 a little wider if anything.

------------------------------ |i7 920 D0@3.6 |CNPS10 flex |ex58-ud5 |6Gig 1333 C7 |HD 5870
|G11 keyboard|X-fi Xtreme |G930 |3x1tb SpinPoint f3's raid 0 |thermaltake tp 850watt |antec 902
|Rat 7 contagion |Razer Destructor mat |bamboo pen'N'touch | 3d pro stick |nitro wheel |360 pad
Reply to HEXiT

An update. After much struggle and strain, I am finally up and running on my i7-2600k, with a Z68 mobo, and my hd7970 working properly, I now slaughter games. I can even run witcher 2 with ubersampling, which is remarkable for a single GPU.

Reply to PerpAnd

PerpAnd wrote :

An update. After much struggle and strain, I am finally up and running on my i7-2600k, with a Z68 mobo, and my hd7970 working properly, I now slaughter games. I can even run witcher 2 with ubersampling, which is remarkable for a single GPU.


Now all the people who think there phenoms thinking that they are getting good fps or should i say the max they could get out of their gpus just look like noobs now. I said it before and ill say it again, phenoms can't play this game in the same league that a sb cpu can.


Message edited by cbrunnem on 02-01-2012 at 04:04:43 PM
Reply to cbrunnem
Register or log in to remove.
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > 1090T bottlenecking a 7970?
Go to:

There are 2100 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Case with filters. Recommendations?
By al360ex, 8 hours ago:

Then I'd go with one of these cases. If you choose the HAF 932 Advanced Edition, you...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts