Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality setting
?
Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question on
a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
"Beck" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3c7p5iF6lmfg7U1@individual.net...
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality
> setting ?
> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question
> on a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Beck wrote:
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality setting
> ?
> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question on
> a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
Hi Beck...
For mighty good prints, you need about 200 pixels per inch
of print. So, in your case, (approximately) 2000 / 200 equals
10 inches wide - therefore 8 x 10 will be mighty nice
For the very very best, the kind of prints that you can
examine with a magnifying glass, you want about 300 pixels
per inch. So, your 2000 / 300 would give you an incredibly
good (about) 7 inches in the biggest dimension.
Others opinions, and your mileage, may vary. Do a couple
of tests for yourself.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Ken Weitzel" <kweitzel@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:8oy7e.1012900$8l.913286@pd7tw1no...
>
>
> Beck wrote:
>> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality
>> setting ?
>> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question
>> on a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
>
> Hi Beck...
>
> For mighty good prints, you need about 200 pixels per inch
> of print. So, in your case, (approximately) 2000 / 200 equals
> 10 inches wide - therefore 8 x 10 will be mighty nice >
> For the very very best, the kind of prints that you can
> examine with a magnifying glass, you want about 300 pixels
> per inch. So, your 2000 / 300 would give you an incredibly
> good (about) 7 inches in the biggest dimension.
>
> Others opinions, and your mileage, may vary. Do a couple
> of tests for yourself.
Thanks Ken. Sounds good.
Its confusing when I get differing information. Some guy in a forum
insisting that anything above 6x4 would be unacceptable.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Beck" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3c7qp8F6l9thgU1@individual.net...
>
> "Ken Weitzel" <kweitzel@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:8oy7e.1012900$8l.913286@pd7tw1no...
>>
>>
>> Beck wrote:
>>> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality
>>> setting ?
>>> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the
>>> question on a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
>>
>> Hi Beck...
>>
>> For mighty good prints, you need about 200 pixels per inch
>> of print. So, in your case, (approximately) 2000 / 200 equals
>> 10 inches wide - therefore 8 x 10 will be mighty nice >>
>> For the very very best, the kind of prints that you can
>> examine with a magnifying glass, you want about 300 pixels
>> per inch. So, your 2000 / 300 would give you an incredibly
>> good (about) 7 inches in the biggest dimension.
>>
>> Others opinions, and your mileage, may vary. Do a couple
>> of tests for yourself. >
> Thanks Ken. Sounds good.
> Its confusing when I get differing information. Some guy in a forum
> insisting that anything above 6x4 would be unacceptable.
The DPI you choose for printing should relate to whether you are viewing
under a magnifying glass or standing six feet away, or ? ? ?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Beck wrote:
[]
> Thanks Ken. Sounds good.
> Its confusing when I get differing information. Some guy in a forum
> insisting that anything above 6x4 would be unacceptable.
Different people do have different acceptability levels! 8 x 10 inches
should be fine, but there's no margin for cropping, and the print won't be
quite as sharp as from an 8MP camera.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Beck wrote:
>
> "Dave R knows who" <kilbyfan@spamnotAOL.com> wrote in message
> news:NWy7e.14634$m31.140959@typhoon.sonic.net...
>
>>
>>
>> The DPI you choose for printing should relate to whether you are viewing
>> under a magnifying glass or standing six feet away, or ? ? ?
>
> How would I choose the DPI when taking pictures on Digital?
Other than changing resoltuions, you can't choose the DPI with a digital
camera.. Cameras produce fixed arrays: X pixels by Y pixels.
DPI is the print size divided by the number of pixels.
An image that's 1000 pixels wide printed at 10 inches would be 100 DPI.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Jim Townsend" <not@real.address> wrote in message
news:115tgka8gu4b852@news.supernews.com...
> Beck wrote:
>
>>
>> "Dave R knows who" <kilbyfan@spamnotAOL.com> wrote in message
>> news:NWy7e.14634$m31.140959@typhoon.sonic.net...
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The DPI you choose for printing should relate to whether you are viewing
>>> under a magnifying glass or standing six feet away, or ? ? ?
>>
>> How would I choose the DPI when taking pictures on Digital?
>
> Other than changing resoltuions, you can't choose the DPI with a digital
> camera.. Cameras produce fixed arrays: X pixels by Y pixels.
>
> DPI is the print size divided by the number of pixels.
>
> An image that's 1000 pixels wide printed at 10 inches would be 100 DPI.
>
> (1000 pixels / 10 inches = 100 dots per inch)
Okay this is all getting very confusing, sorry.
At the end of the day, all I really need to know is what sies the resolution
will print good pictures for. I doubt anyone is going to analyse them with
a magnifying glass, they are just momentos of a lcoal event.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Beck <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality setting
> ?
> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question on
> a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
200dpi is usually reckoned to be 'good enough' so, do the sums - 10x8
*should* be at least OK, and 7x5 or 6x4 very good indeed.
Some people say 300dpi is essential, in which case they'd only be happy
with 6x4s.
The only real answer is - try it and see. Depends on the picture,
depends on the printer, depends on the postprocessing you've done, depends
on the person looking at them, depends on how closely you're looking. I've
got everything from 1600x1200s at 30x20" that look great as posters to
the odd 2304x1728 that still looks lousy at 6x4".
pete
--
pete@fenelon.com "Send lawyers, guns and money...."
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Beck <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> Okay this is all getting very confusing, sorry.
> At the end of the day, all I really need to know is what sies the resolution
> will print good pictures for. I doubt anyone is going to analyse them with
> a magnifying glass, they are just momentos of a lcoal event.
>
Nobody's going to moan about 7x5s at that resolution, and all but the
most photo-snobbish will find 8x10s highly acceptable.
pete
--
pete@fenelon.com "Send lawyers, guns and money...."
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Beck" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3c7p5iF6lmfg7U1@individual.net...
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality
setting
> ?
> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question
on
> a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
>
Do the math yourself. Dividing 1488 by 8 yields 186 pixels per inch. That
is marginally acceptable. So, it appears that you can make an 8x10 print.
You must decide whether you like that size or not.
Jim
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
If you can get 240 dpi you can do an 8x10. Sometimes you can do it on a lot
less but it will depend on the individule picture. I have a 16x20 that was
printed at 140-160 dpi (actual res forgotten) and it looks good enough that
I've snot only sold two prints of it but it is one of the prints my wife
specified for out livingroom wall.
Everything has to do with detail and that is a "mood" shot in predawn fog,
with few details. I have other pictures that will not survive conversion
below 200 dpi.
"Beck" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3c7p5iF6lmfg7U1@individual.net...
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality
setting
> ?
> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question
on
> a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Beck wrote:
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality
> setting ?
>
Depends on how well it was exposed, if it was shot at a high enough shutter
speed where there is no motion blur etc. I've made pretty nice 8X10's from
1600X1200 images with some post processing sharpening and upsampling.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Beck wrote:
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality setting
> ?
> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question on
> a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
>
>
You need something like 200 to 300 pixels per inch. 1984 x 1488 can be
comfortably rounded to 2000 x 1500. That says you can get 10 x 7.5
prints at pretty good quality or about a 6 3/4 x 5 at top quality.
You need to consider the range. First of all, what some people will
call unacceptable, others will find acceptable. Also, different
subjects call for different resolutions. Landscapes, for instance, may
work fine on lessor resolution than manmade objects with lots of detail,
especially high contrast scenes.
There is no sudden magic ppi when a fuzzy image turns into a razor sharp
one.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
Beck wrote:
> "Dave R knows who" <kilbyfan@spamnotAOL.com> wrote in message
> news:NWy7e.14634$m31.140959@typhoon.sonic.net...
>
>
>>
>>The DPI you choose for printing should relate to whether you are viewing
>>under a magnifying glass or standing six feet away, or ? ? ?
>
>
> How would I choose the DPI when taking pictures on Digital?
>
>
Depends on what software you are using. For instance, Paint Shop Pro
has several options for changing size. However, it always shows what
the ppi will be in the resulting print. There is also an option for
downsampling when resizing- avoid that option.
In other software you MAY have to select a ppi and it will show the
resulting print size. But the better software will allow you to size by
physical size, in inches, and then show you what the ppi will be at that
size.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
"Beck" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3c7p5iF6lmfg7U1@individual.net...
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality
> setting ?
> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question
> on a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)
If the image is clean and sharp a good 8x10 is quite possible. I've made
many from far less.
Beck wrote:
> What is the biggest print size I can get from 1984x1488 high quality setting
> ?
> Some articles I have seen say 8x10" prints, but when I asked the question on
> a forum someone suggested only 6x4" is possible.
>
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.