Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Starting to think that I just have a junk chip.

Starting to think that I just have a junk chip.

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs Starting to think that I just have a junk chip.

Word :    Username :           
 

I see alot of people's stable i5-2500k's at certain vcores that blows my mind compared to my chip. I see alot of people at 5ghz with 1.45vcore where for me to get just 4.8ghz stable I need 1.47vcore. Seems the "average" vcore needed for 4.8ghz is around 1.38-1.40 vcore. I understand the whole golden chip thing but I feel like I got a turd of a chip. Thoughts?

Reply to krisco65
Register or log in to remove.

im betting those people who get the 1.45 VCore are using Cpu load line calibration... I5-2500k aint no turd of a chip :P

Reply to nna2

I am also using LLC. I have used all 5 levels of it actually. I also dont mean that the i5-2500k is a turd, I mean my specific chip is.

Reply to krisco65

oh, these people have prime95'd or somthing equivalent right? coz i can acheive 4GHz easily, maintaining it under full load is another story

Reply to nna2

Yes. Specificaly prime95 100% load for 12 hours. I would like to do that at 5.0ghz once.

Reply to krisco65

then i would probaly blame your setup, some are just better overclockers than others, i will direct you at a video, bear in mind it is about fx...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u7MIwphuoE

Reply to nna2

4.8ghz 1.395vcore

------------------------------ Overclocked Intel HD 3000 Performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] e#t1978730
Thermal Paste Removal/Installation Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] emoval-ins
Reply to amuffin

amuffin wrote :

4.8ghz 1.395vcore



Exactly. That also means that 5ghz will be no problem for you on an accetpable vcore. This is what I would expect from my chip and why it angers me.

Reply to krisco65

krisco65 wrote :

Exactly. That also means that 5ghz will be no problem for you on an accetpable vcore. This is what I would expect from my chip and why it angers me.


Why are you even aiming for such a high overclock lol? :heink:

------------------------------ Overclocked Intel HD 3000 Performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] e#t1978730
Thermal Paste Removal/Installation Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] emoval-ins
Reply to amuffin

Personal gratification and the learning experience. I don't like being limited by the hardware instead of my ability.

Reply to krisco65

krisco65 wrote :

Personal gratification and the learning experience. I don't like being limited by the hardware instead of my ability.


What cooler?

------------------------------ Overclocked Intel HD 3000 Performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] e#t1978730
Thermal Paste Removal/Installation Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] emoval-ins
Reply to amuffin

Noctua NH-D14. My temps at 4.8ghz are only 61 degrees so I know that heat wont be a problem, but all I see is to never go over 1.52vcore etc.

Reply to krisco65

krisco65 wrote :

Noctua NH-D14. My temps at 4.8ghz are only 61 degrees so I know that heat wont be a problem, but all I see is to never go over 1.52vcore etc.


Try 1.405 and lower it by .005v and run prime, basically keep doing this until the overclock is unstable and revert to the voltage right above the crashing one.

------------------------------ Overclocked Intel HD 3000 Performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] e#t1978730
Thermal Paste Removal/Installation Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] emoval-ins
Reply to amuffin

A little confused about your reply. I stated that 1.47vcore is the minimum voltage I can ran or 4.8ghz will BSOD. So Im not really sure what you are suggesting. Thanks.

Reply to krisco65

1.47 is way too high!!!!

------------------------------ Overclocked Intel HD 3000 Performance: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] e#t1978730
Thermal Paste Removal/Installation Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] emoval-ins
Reply to amuffin

Remember that people usually won't post their overclocks unless they've gone well; the people that get the 5.0 GHz "golden chips" are the ones who will post about it when they OC. It may be that your chip just isn't perfect (although 4.8 GHz is nothing to sniff at); it may be that your motherboard isn't great for overclocking, which could be due to low power phase count (more power phases usually means less fluctuation in voltage to the CPU, which helps) and/or poor northbridge cooling. What motherboard are you using?

Also, in the mean time don't run it at 1.47V 24/7 (although I'm assuming you aren't), as it's not good for the chip. Also, I'm not a skilled overclocker per se (I dabble), and I know there are some more obscure voltages you can tweak to improve the stability of your overclock; you may want to look for some advanced overclocking guides; this one isn't necessarily too complex, but notice that they change the CPU PLL, VCCSA, and VCCIO to improve the stability of their overclock. Try changing those a bit, they ought to improve stability :)

Reply to PurpleHayes
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Starting to think that I just have a junk chip.
Go to:

There are 2022 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Case with filters. Recommendations?
By al360ex, 8 hours ago:

Then I'd go with one of these cases. If you choose the HAF 932 Advanced Edition, you...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts