Hi there,
I just recently purchased a new rig and I'm seeming to get 10-15fps lower than any GTX 590 benchmark I can find. I'm not sure why and I was wondering if you guys had any ideas.
My rig:
CPU: Core i7 2600k @ stock (3.4)
RAM: Kingston Hyper X 1600
GPU: EVGA GTX 590 Classified
MOBO: Asus p8z68v-pro
PSU: Corsair 1200 watt Professional Series
Case: CM HAF X
Harddrive: OCZ Vertex 3 120gb(only for boot as of now)
Harddrive: WD Caviar Black 1tb (for games and software)
The best example of the less than average FPS I get is in the original Crysis where at max settings with 8xAA at 1920x1080 I average about 10fps.
I was watching a video of a person who had very similar specs to mine who obtained 50-80fps with the same settings at the same resolution. Here is that video; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBbkMgwrD8s.
The only differences really are the overclocked CPU and the faster ram. But I don't see how those would make a 40-70fps difference.
The really weird part is that even though I get less than average fps on games, my 3dmark 11 score is X3264 which is more than double the highest score for the GTX 590 not-sli on their site. I have no idea how to explain this and so I've come to you guys. Do you guys have any ideas as to what the heck is going on?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
I just recently purchased a new rig and I'm seeming to get 10-15fps lower than any GTX 590 benchmark I can find. I'm not sure why and I was wondering if you guys had any ideas.
My rig:
CPU: Core i7 2600k @ stock (3.4)
RAM: Kingston Hyper X 1600
GPU: EVGA GTX 590 Classified
MOBO: Asus p8z68v-pro
PSU: Corsair 1200 watt Professional Series
Case: CM HAF X
Harddrive: OCZ Vertex 3 120gb(only for boot as of now)
Harddrive: WD Caviar Black 1tb (for games and software)
The best example of the less than average FPS I get is in the original Crysis where at max settings with 8xAA at 1920x1080 I average about 10fps.
I was watching a video of a person who had very similar specs to mine who obtained 50-80fps with the same settings at the same resolution. Here is that video; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBbkMgwrD8s.
The only differences really are the overclocked CPU and the faster ram. But I don't see how those would make a 40-70fps difference.
The really weird part is that even though I get less than average fps on games, my 3dmark 11 score is X3264 which is more than double the highest score for the GTX 590 not-sli on their site. I have no idea how to explain this and so I've come to you guys. Do you guys have any ideas as to what the heck is going on?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!