A lens test for the 28-75 f2.8 XR DI

Archived from groups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

It looks like this lens compares well against the Canon lens and cost a
fraction of the price.

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2931072



Cody,

Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins
be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like
crimson, they shall be as wool. Isaiah 1:18

http://community-2.webtv.net/AnOve [...] raphyLinks

Archived from groups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:40:59 +0300, Andres <keegi@kusagil.ee> wrote:

>do you know if it fits also film bodies?

Works just fine.

--
Michael Benveniste -- mhb-offer@clearether.com
Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email
address only to submit mail for evaluation.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

In rec.photo.equipment.35mm Andres <keegi@kusagil.ee> wrote:
> AnOvercomer 02 wrote:
> > It looks like this lens compares well against the Canon lens and cost a
> > fraction of the price.
>
> do you know if it fits also film bodies?

yes. the DA/DX style APS-C sized sensor lens from Tamron
have the Di-II designation.

>
> Andres

--
Sander

+++ Out of cheese error +++

Archived from groups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Or maybe it's "AnOvercomer 02" that I should have said instead of
"Cody". Sorry, I'm new at this site.

Patzt

*********
Join us at http://photography-cafe.com

Archived from groups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital (More info?)

(Patzt)
>Or maybe it's "AnOvercomer 02" that I
> should have said instead of "Cody".
> Sorry, I'm new at this site.

Cody, is fine.