Athlon X3 or Phenom II Quad

Question - where are you getting the Athlon II 455 from? It's about $80 on newegg right now, which puts it at the same price as a Pentium G630, which is a slightly better gaming CPU. If possible, I'd recommend getting the G630.

More to your specific question, I would expect an x3 Rana at 3.3 GHz to perform better in games than an X4 Deneb at 2.8 GHz, but it's not going to be a HUGE difference either way I don't think. It will probably also depend slightly on the game.

So, for the gaming PC, my recommendation would be:
#1 - Pentium G630
#2 - Rana x3
#3 - Deneb x4

the phenom will be faster than the athlon even with the lower clock rate.

Make sure you get a motherboard that supports both the cpu and ddr2 memory.

Revision to my recommendation - just looked around at some benchmarks out of curiosity and it looks like the deneb will edge out the rana in games despite the clock difference.

It's not gonna be a huge difference, though. The G630 is still the best option for ~$80.

I should have probably put that Intel is right out, I already have a nice AMD board and DDR 2 RAM so no go for any Intel.

Now you see my problem, you say Deneb, the post directly below you says Rana, i can't seem to find any kind of definite data that will help me decide. And I already have a nice ECS board that supports DDR 2 and the RAM so that's all free and clear, its only the CPU i need to decide on.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/athlon-l3-cache,241...

keep in mind, the higher the clock the more the deneb pulls ahead due the the L3.

the tests are done at 2.6 ghz but at 3 ghz the athlon starts to show very little scaling while the phenoms are still decent. In gaming its more apparent than general processing.

Could you point me towards those benchmarks? Because the only ones i've been able to find (Here naturally) is comparing an identically clocked Phenom II to Athlon II which doesn't really tell me anything as what i need to know is which is more important, raw speed (Athlon X3 at 3.3GHz) or quad cores (Deneb at 2.8GHz) and I can't find a single one with CPUs even close to the ones I'm looking at. And as I said Intel would price it right out of my budget as I already have the board and RAM which would both have to be chunked to use the G630.

seems like theres not much to go on but I'd think the phenom will be better very marginally.

I've looked at that bench and it has BOTH chips at identical speeds and shows them having almost identical scores in games. While I appreciate the effort with this particular problem we are talking about a pretty big difference, one having a 4th core and L3 while the other has 500MHz x3 speed difference on the other and with this board I simply can't OC the Deneb so its claims about deneb OCing higher simply won't help as the defaults is what he is gonna be stuck with. If anyone knows about LA Noire or MMOs and can shed light on whether tis better to have raw clocks or more cores I'd be grateful but this ECS board simply won't OC at all, so there is no way I can bring the deneb any faster than default clocks.

Frankly it was soooo much easier when faster equaled better, now you got arches and IPC and caches and ugh. But if I were to go by that article I should probably just flip a quarter as it says there really isn't a difference until you start OCing or doing apps like video editing which he'll never do, just games. if it were me it'd be simply more cores all the way, but I don't game enough to care about and have been out of the gaming loop for two long to know whether raw clocks or L3 is better. that article makes me even more confused as it says a 200Mhz clock increase is enough to pull the Athlon equal to the Deneb, does that mean a 500Mhz increase would pull it ahead? i just don't know.

But now you see my problem, the guy below you swears it rana, you swear its deneb, and the article says at even clocks its a quarter flip. I've scoured the net but simply can't find any benches with the two chips in a similar situation or even similar chips with a similar situation so i don't know how much speed would make the Athlon better or if its simply cores above all. I've asked all my gamer friends and its been the same, some swear its one, some the other...sigh. maybe there just isn't a right answer here. But I do appreciate the attempt so thanks.

Best answer selected by bassbeast.

Thanks, if they are really that close as you said i'll give the boy the X4 deneb and the GF the Athlon because in the end she'll be on FB and chat all day so i don't she'd even stress a dual core whereas if its one thing i've learned about kids is they always want the latest games   . I just hope his HD4850 will tide him over for now as I'll still have to upgrade his brother down the line but for now at least he got himself a new laptop with one of his college grants and the only game he plays (Star wars KoTOR MMO) plays fine on his laptop so he's happy for now. But thanks for the link, if that article is correct they are so close I might as well just let him have the extra core.

This topic has been closed by Mousemonkey