Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 (
More info?)
"Android" <androvich@NOcomcastSPAM.net> wrote in message
> If a PSP game can offer nearly the same graphics as a PS2 game and the
same
> length of playing time, why is $49 unreasonable? And perhaps you are
> forgetting about the days of the $69 SNES games.
I'm not forgetting--I'm fearing a return! I still have receipts for my SNES
and N64 games. I paid over $100 for Secret of Mana (couldn't find it
anywhere but Service Merchandise). Thanks to the switch in media type (CDs
cost fractions of a cent to manufacture, carts were $20+), and competition,
$50 became the standard price for home games, and also removed the risk in
this business for publishers. Now they want to raise the price, and there
is NOT a valid reason other than they think they can get away with it.
> I don't think game prices haven't fallen since there have been 3 consoles
> instead of 2. When there was just Atari vs. Intellivision, games were in
> the $40-$50 range. When there was just SNES vs. Genesis, the prices for
> cartridges were in the $40-$60 range. When there was just PlayStation vs.
> Saturn, the prices were in the $40-$50 range. When there was just
> PlayStation and N64, the prices were in the $40-$60 range.
You need to check your facts--I just did. I have my original receipts for
my PS games. Playstation games were 59.99 until a little AFTER the N64
launched. Competition drove them down to $50, because they knew Nintendo
couldn't match that. SNES and Genesis games were often 69.99.
Prices of both
> consoles and games have been pretty steady over time. Only with Sony's
> "Greatest Hits" pricing did we see $19 games, but that was started by Sony
> back when it was still a 2 console race.
But this generation, we've seen games LAUNCH at $40, $30, and even $20. I'm
not talking about Greatest Hits--even though that was another tactic by Sony
that they knew the N64 couldn't do--again, competition is good for us.
> I don't think there is much of a difference in price between a $35
Nintendo
> DS cartridge and a $39 Sony PSP disk. Third parties such as EA, not Sony,
> are charging $49 for PSP disks. If we don't buy them, perhaps they will
> rethink their pricing.
That's what I'm saying! Don't buy, or we'll be paying higher prices
permanently! And you say there's not much difference between $35 for a DS
game and $39 for a PSP disc, but $35 is the high end of the pricing for DS,
and $39 is the low end for PSP--and the PSP uses far cheaper media!
UMD discs cost pennies, believe me, whereas DS media costs dollars. If Sony
weren't so arrogant, they'd be pulling the same trick on Nintendo as they
did back in the N64/PS1 days out price their games LOWER. But now they're
market leader and looking for another Playstation-like money machine.
> Well, the only UMD movie out is Spider-man 2 and it isn't sold separately,
> so we'll see if the rest of the UMD movies are actually priced at $30
> instead of $20 when they are released next month.
UMD movies should come with DVDs in the box--both formats for one price.
Then $20-$30 would be worth it, and the extra DVD disc would only cost Sony
(or whomever) a few cents.
I think you'll see
> sub-$30 PSP games after a year or so, depending upon how well the system
> sells and if they can reduce the UMD manufacturing costs. Why wouldn't
Sony
> have a PSP "Greatest Hits" line as they have with all their consoles?
Just
> because Nintendo never did that with their portables (when they had no
> competition) doesn't mean Sony won't. And no--I don't count the "Classic
> Series" rehashes of old NES games for $19-$29 to be a Greatest Hits line.
I
> mean seeing Advance Wars or Super Mario Advance for $19 after they had
been
> out for a year.
I'm not talking about Greatest Hits lines. I'm talking about initial
prices. I don't buy Greatest Hits/Player Choice/Platinum games because I
don't wait that long, and I don't want budget-marked packaging. I'm more
than willing to cough up full price for games. I have nearly 200
current-gen games (counting GBA) and not a single Greatest Hit game in the
bunch.
But I DO object to them raising that price. And if they get away with it,
remember that Greatest Hits games' pricing will probably rise, too. $60 for
a new game will probably mean $30 for a GH game.