Now while being a computer builder and building locally and servicing for people around town I have pretty decent knowledge about what parts work what parts don't work and how to troubleshoot most of them... but when it comes to definitive answers why certain things work better in the CPU world I can't really tell... My question here is probably answered somewhere else but I couldn't really find anything that was a suitable answer.... Now I am not really a fanboy of any CPU Brand... ( although I am when it comes to graphics card I don't really like Nvidia at all. ) basically I buy for needs... if I have budget for an intel I would get an intel because for w.e reason they always WAY out perform AMD... but usually I don't have 200-300 extra dollars laying around and so don't most customers....I get lot of questions lately about why the I5-2500k and I7 are so expensive compared to AMD chips and my normal response is because I7 supports hyper threading so it can run more information faster so it cost more... and the I5-2500k is super overclockable and runs pretty cool. But I don't really have a good answer to them as to why a I5-2500K that basically has the same Specs as some AMD CPUs that are half the price runs 5xs better in CPU heavy tasks especially when they feature similar specs are sometimes even better specs on the AMD side sometimes and still under performs.
We can see from the hundreds of test that the I5-2500k IS right now the Peak for building a gaming PC. Basically even if you put a I7-2600k which by all means IS faster you won't see much difference in games... So why is this case Vs say a Phenom II x4 980 or something that has higher clock and similar cache... Is it the overall design of the chip? I figure it has something to do with the Threads and Intel has more threads to pass more information faster? I mean I'm not one of those idiots that gets bent out of shape when their 150 dollar CPU from AMD isn't beating a top end 230 dollar Intel CPU because lets face it... they aren't suppose too... and AMD has never released a CPU other then I think the FX-8150? and said THIS CPU BEATS EVERYTHING INTEL HAS. AMD has always been to me for the home builders and the low/mid range people... because honestly... compared to intels other chips... AMD usually wins... because the lower end I5s and I7s are pretty garbage I've had them.. and built computers with them and wasn't very impressed for how much they usually cost... Besides Intel never updates its older CPU line because AMD dominates that market. With AMD recently giving up Desktop CPU production with the fail of bulldozer and switching purely into laptops... ( which they are dominating in so its a smart choice.. I mean I haven't seen a Intel based laptop in any retail store for the past 4 months.. they are all APU based amd chips ) So this isn't a question of why does my 80 dollar AMD triple core not beat a 230 dollar chip.. its more of What makes that chip so good compared to others? I read lot of stuff but I see similar chips with similar specs and threads and other crap and they never do as good... Quality of material? I know AMD was always stubborn when it came to changing the way its processors were designed so they were always limited by that but shouldn't a CPU with similar Cache... Similar power requirements similar clock speed run just as fast as the other one?
Anyway This is just out of curiosity as I haven't bothered with intel in awhile and its a common question I get asked that I can't really explain without confusing people and if you bothered to read this giant thread I applaud you and thank anyone who gives a pretty basic answer. Although We don't need flame wars started here this is just a question about how the architecture of the chip works.
on a side note... Bulldozer failed because 64bit OS don't support the hyper threading on the chips yet right? because I been steering customers away from them for now because of unfavorable reviews but since Windows 8 is coming out soon I figure the performance should stabilize and make them worth buying soon yes? if not let me know with a real answer why.. Not looking for Fanboy responses here.
We can see from the hundreds of test that the I5-2500k IS right now the Peak for building a gaming PC. Basically even if you put a I7-2600k which by all means IS faster you won't see much difference in games... So why is this case Vs say a Phenom II x4 980 or something that has higher clock and similar cache... Is it the overall design of the chip? I figure it has something to do with the Threads and Intel has more threads to pass more information faster? I mean I'm not one of those idiots that gets bent out of shape when their 150 dollar CPU from AMD isn't beating a top end 230 dollar Intel CPU because lets face it... they aren't suppose too... and AMD has never released a CPU other then I think the FX-8150? and said THIS CPU BEATS EVERYTHING INTEL HAS. AMD has always been to me for the home builders and the low/mid range people... because honestly... compared to intels other chips... AMD usually wins... because the lower end I5s and I7s are pretty garbage I've had them.. and built computers with them and wasn't very impressed for how much they usually cost... Besides Intel never updates its older CPU line because AMD dominates that market. With AMD recently giving up Desktop CPU production with the fail of bulldozer and switching purely into laptops... ( which they are dominating in so its a smart choice.. I mean I haven't seen a Intel based laptop in any retail store for the past 4 months.. they are all APU based amd chips ) So this isn't a question of why does my 80 dollar AMD triple core not beat a 230 dollar chip.. its more of What makes that chip so good compared to others? I read lot of stuff but I see similar chips with similar specs and threads and other crap and they never do as good... Quality of material? I know AMD was always stubborn when it came to changing the way its processors were designed so they were always limited by that but shouldn't a CPU with similar Cache... Similar power requirements similar clock speed run just as fast as the other one?
Anyway This is just out of curiosity as I haven't bothered with intel in awhile and its a common question I get asked that I can't really explain without confusing people and if you bothered to read this giant thread I applaud you and thank anyone who gives a pretty basic answer. Although We don't need flame wars started here this is just a question about how the architecture of the chip works.
on a side note... Bulldozer failed because 64bit OS don't support the hyper threading on the chips yet right? because I been steering customers away from them for now because of unfavorable reviews but since Windows 8 is coming out soon I figure the performance should stabilize and make them worth buying soon yes? if not let me know with a real answer why.. Not looking for Fanboy responses here.