Hi,
This just occurred to me when I was looking through some gaming benchmarks where gpu from one brand were being outperfomed by the other even though theoretically they should be better. For ex: Crysis 2 runs better on gtx 560 non 'ti' than the 6870 even though the 6870 is usually better.
Theoretical value:
http://www.hwcompare.com/11005/geforce-gtx-560-vs-radeon-hd-6870/
And here are the benchmarks:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-560-amp-edition-gtx-560-directcu-ii-top,2944-6.html
In fact in that review it states: "An Nvidia TWIMTBP title, Crysis 2 delivers higher performance with GeForce cards, although the Radeons are close behind. The new GeForce GTX 560 beats AMD's Radeon HD 6870."
Then again, in some games Radeon is more dominant.
I am wondering if this will be true for BF3, especially since it was tested/made with a Nvidia card, gtx 580 I believe.......
Highly appreciated if someone looks into this.
Thanks
This just occurred to me when I was looking through some gaming benchmarks where gpu from one brand were being outperfomed by the other even though theoretically they should be better. For ex: Crysis 2 runs better on gtx 560 non 'ti' than the 6870 even though the 6870 is usually better.
Theoretical value:
http://www.hwcompare.com/11005/geforce-gtx-560-vs-radeon-hd-6870/
And here are the benchmarks:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-560-amp-edition-gtx-560-directcu-ii-top,2944-6.html
In fact in that review it states: "An Nvidia TWIMTBP title, Crysis 2 delivers higher performance with GeForce cards, although the Radeons are close behind. The new GeForce GTX 560 beats AMD's Radeon HD 6870."
Then again, in some games Radeon is more dominant.
I am wondering if this will be true for BF3, especially since it was tested/made with a Nvidia card, gtx 580 I believe.......
Highly appreciated if someone looks into this.
Thanks