rds1220 :
Pff absoloutly clueless...
. Here's an idea how about you go on the internet and do some reading. You'll see the Bulldozer is a joke. It was in devlopment for how many years and it gets out performed by older Phenom II's and Athelon II and it doesnt come close to touching Sandy Bridges in most programs. You are compleatly a lost cause if you think the Bulldozer is faster at stock speeds. Clock for clock it doesnt beat a Sandy Bridges. A Bulldozer has to be overclcked just to be equal to a stock Intel Sandy Bridges. Thats how pathetic it is.
Yea we're fanboys..ok. Why because we state facts that are backed up by tons of reviews and benchmarks. The Bulldozer is a joke and so are the AMD fanboys that fanatically try to justify what they bought with false claims and down right lies.
look if you aint going to give this guy help with his choice then go trool another thread on intel stuff.
its you who have no clue about things sunshine. ive used old and new AMD products and also intel and Nvidia products, im not one sided like you are and also norrow minded and self obsessed with playing with intels balls and asking for man love with them.
i use what best for the job and pice at hand and this guy is obviously trying to do the same.
intel is great sure no question but AMD is good and not as crap as shemales like you that want to pleasure the intel bosses to get a good name for themself's.
i have the following at home AMD 955, 1090T, FX-8150, also Intel 2500 and the newLGA 2011 3930K all work fine with games all run things at highest level and all do whats needed and then some, so you tell me then whats so bad about things that work and do the job thats asked of them ?
my answer is nothing what so ever so go trool in a forum full of intel fangirls and all play with yourself's seeing who has the best gear
leave the forum stuff to the real people who ACTUALLY want to help people ok kid
now theres a good boy