Hello,
I've seen some good, quick responses on this site, so I thought I'd ask my question too. Here goes:
How much better is the i5-2500 than the q9300? I know it's newer generation and stuff, but still- the only differences are the clock speed and lithography. They're both about the same price (in my country, I don't know about anywhere else) and I don't want to spend ~$260 just for 0.8 MHz more per core, cooler operation and possibly less power consumption.
Also, would a q9300 bottleneck an Asus engtx 560(non-ti) dc2 top 1gb?
Thanks in advance.
NOTE: I'm not considering overclocking, so that's why I didn't mention multiplier with the CPUs. And q9300 is my current CPU.
I've seen some good, quick responses on this site, so I thought I'd ask my question too. Here goes:
How much better is the i5-2500 than the q9300? I know it's newer generation and stuff, but still- the only differences are the clock speed and lithography. They're both about the same price (in my country, I don't know about anywhere else) and I don't want to spend ~$260 just for 0.8 MHz more per core, cooler operation and possibly less power consumption.
Also, would a q9300 bottleneck an Asus engtx 560(non-ti) dc2 top 1gb?
Thanks in advance.
NOTE: I'm not considering overclocking, so that's why I didn't mention multiplier with the CPUs. And q9300 is my current CPU.