FX 6100 v FX 6200

[ceejay93]

I have found the FX-6200, which is no easy task, and its around £15/20 more than the 6100, besides the stated extra 2MB cache, 0.5GHZ and 30W power requirement, are there any notable performance differences ?

Cheers

 

[seumas_beathan]

Go with the 6200, the cache and clock speed will make a difference

 

[jaguarskx]

I would go with the FX-6200. The extra 2MB of cache and 500MHz clockspeed is worth the additional money.