Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

FX 6100 v FX 6200

Last response: in CPUs
March 2, 2012 7:18:23 PM

I have found the FX-6200, which is no easy task, and its around £15/20 more than the 6100, besides the stated extra 2MB cache, 0.5GHZ and 30W power requirement, are there any notable performance differences ?


More about : 6100 6200

March 2, 2012 7:27:03 PM

Go with the 6200, the cache and clock speed will make a difference
a c 471 à CPUs
March 2, 2012 9:13:04 PM

I would go with the FX-6200. The extra 2MB of cache and 500MHz clockspeed is worth the additional money.